TheEarthPLan.com

The Earth Plan:

LFL Founder Out Of Hiding With Extrodinary Solution to fix
Government
Peopleisim.org :

Peopleisim

The Construct of Live & Origin of Everything - Soulisim:

Soulisim

ADVERISE HERE:

 

C's Jefferson Lesson #1
Taking Back Government
- The Function And Form Of Your Grand Jury

Today in America most citizens don't even know the difference between a Grand Jury and a Trial Jury. Hardly any know that they have all the authority and duty to form Grand Juries themselves. Are you aware that Judges are not allowed to go anywhere near a Grand Jury? Do you know the Court is not responsible for managing a Grand Jury and neither is the District Attorney? Grand Jury's which predate the Magna Carta are a mandatory part of the Law dictated by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution for The United States of America.

To understand the origin and purpose of the Grand Jury let's watch a scene from Monty Python:

The term "Witch hunt" originates from the era where to get rid of opponents, kings and their public officials would simply accuse their opponents of being witches. The accused would usually be tied up in a sack with stones and thrown in the river. If the accused sank, oh well, they must have been innocent, if they floated, they were a witch and burned at the stake.

Hence the State had a foolproof way to get rid of anyone they wanted. Not unlike the government in the US today when District Attorneys rack up long laundry lists of charges and so-called "code violations" which they file against the accused. The DA brings the victim before their colleague who's previous job was usually also in the DA's office as a DA, called a judge. The Judge and DA conspire with another member of their criminal cabal who is also an officer of "their" court and a member of their British Accreditation Registry, otherwise known as the BAR, called a lawyer. This three way team then trick the victim to enter into a private contract to be prosecuted. Bypassing the law, they ask the victim how they would like to enter into the contract, how they would like to plea? Claiming that the victim has entered into their court by their own choice this criminal enterprise proceeds with the lynching.

If the BAR lawyer did not go along with the witch hunt, they would put themselves, the DA, Judge, Sheriffs and Prison Industrial Complex out of a job. The more of a mess their client is in, the more money a lawyer makes. That's why they are one of the only 'so-called professions' that makes their client pay before they receive any useless service.

The sheriffs are usually always in on the witch hunt and public mugging. Arresting the accused without lawful authority they embark on immediate punishment outside of the law, usually literally stealing the victim's vehicle along the way. To thank the sheriff for committing the crime and for hauling the 'witch' into court, the judge awards the sheriff an immediate cash payout of often tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars cash in the form of bail. The cash goes right into the sheriffs account, interest free and sits there all while the slow wheels of injustice grind the victim into pulp.

To keep up the high rate of witch hunts and the associated lucrative returns on the up and up, and to avoid the embarrassment of running a sham trial, the DA and BAR lawyer get together for a good old chat to see what charges they can get away with blackmailing the victim into "agreeing" to pleading to. The blackmail is an 'offer' to drop some of the false charges if the victim enters a 'no contest' or 'guilty' plea along with the fact that the victim knows they will be given a sham trial in front of an idiotic and clueless jury just like the one we saw in Monty Python.

The lawyer will tell their victim that the so-called 'no contest' plea is not the same as entering a 'guilty' plea and will strongly pressure their client into accepting the 'deal'. That way the lawyer does not have to do any more work as by that time he has already charged the client for running the trial and the judge, DA and sheriffs can convince themselves that the victim went willfully to be burned at the stake.

Researchers are uncovering an interesting side accounting to these lynching's. If you take a victim of the Courts birth date, add the case number to it, you will find an account is opened up with Fidelity and someone is cashing in the "Charges". We are still following the money and will report what we find. Clearly however there is a huge profit for prosecution industry. These District Attorneys are Devils Advocates that would make Satan and his Superior Court Judges proud.

What Does The Law Allow?

Does the government have any authority to accuse anyone, can the DA lawfully file charges against anyone? Is a pleabargain lawfu? The answer is a resounding NO!

The 5th Amendment has five part's to it. Taking the 5th as many are aware, is the right to remain silent. However, the 5th Amendment starts off with a more important construct, the dictate and demand at law that no one may be prosecuted without a Grand Jury indictment or presentment:

Article the seventh [Amendment V]
[Grand Jury; Only Tried Once; Remain Silent; Due Process; Just Compensation]
[PROPOSED: September 25th, 1789; ratified December 15th, 1791]

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

There is no ambiguity, no confusion, it is in plain simple English - NO ONE can be prosecuted without a Grand Jury first finding probable cause that a crime was committed by the accused - The government is not "we the people", the Government is not even a real person, they are not Real Parties Of Interest. The DA has absolutely no authority whatsoever to file charges against anyone - that's a witch hunt!

There is no better example than what the government is doing to Liberty For Life's Founder Clive Boustred. After the Santa Cruz Sheriffs unlawfully literally shot at Clive and his children, the Santa Cruz Sheriffs, DA and Judges immediately filed a slew of malicious cases against Clive - the charges of which were as absurd as a Monty Python movie. Bob Lee the Santa Cruz DA, unlawfully taking on the name of "we the people" in blatant, obstinate and treasonous violation of the 5th Amendment charged Clive with "Assault with a deadly weapon" and "Child endangerment" after the Sheriffs shot at Clive and his children! Naturally Clive was unarmed and not breaking any law. Judge Art Danner sent Clive to jail for six months for driving at 27 mph down his private road, which he called a felony. Then Bob Lee filed six more felonies against Clive because Clive owned lawfully purchased guns. The government shoots at Clive and his children then sends Clive to jail for child endangerment and for owning guns! Monty Python could not dream up things this absurd!

However it's no joke, millions of citizens lives are being devastated by Sheriffs, District Attorneys, Judges and Lawyers who commit High Treason and armed robbery, kidnap and blackmail every day in the courts across the Nation.

Not only do these criminals wearing badges and claming to represent 'we the people' sidestep the 5th Amendment Grand Jury dictate, they run criminal trials. The Constitution is blatantly clear, only a Jury can try a criminal case. Again the English is plain and simple with no leeway for "interpretation":

Article the eighth [Amendment VI]
[Speedy Jury Trial With Counsel & Questioning Accuser for All Criminal Cases Where Crime Committed]
[PROPOSED: September 25th, 1789; ratified December 15th, 1791]

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Furthermore Judges sitting in the courts instruct the Jury's that they alone are allowed to determine the law! You will even hear these criminals of the worst possible kind telling the Jury that they the judge says what the law is! Judges claim the right to interpret the law to mean whatever they say it means! Consider the words of Samuel Chase one of the first Supreme Court Justices and signer of the Declaration of Independence: "The jury has the right to judge both the law and the facts". He added to also keep in mind that "either we all hang together, or we most assuredly will all hang separately".

The only properly ratified Californian Constitution even put the fact that a Jury determines both Fact and Law in writing in Article 1 Section 9:

CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA of 1849 
We, the people of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings, do establish this Constitution...

ARTICLE I.
Declaration of Rights.
Sec. 9. Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions on indictments for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libelous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact.

Judges take their criminal acts of High Treason to extreme heights when they literally decide what evidence can and can not be put in front of the jury! This astonishing criminal act by the judiciary takes place in every trial. Obviously any complete moron would realize that if the Judge claims the right to determine what the jury can and can not see, then the judge has complete control of the outcome of the trial!

The sheer incompetence and criminal negligence and criminal acts committed in the courts throughout the US is shocking. The raw statistics illustrate how utterly out of control the Courts in the US are. According to the Department of Justice and International Prison Studies, the US has more people in jail, prison and on probation than any other Nation in the world. The US is the World's Worst Prison State. Not only the worst low-level scum-bucket injustice system in the entire world, the US is not just worse than the most outrageous Banana Republic, the US is worse than all the Nations in the world combined! These statistics should have the people of the USA out on the streets and into the Courthouses forming Grand Juries, charging, prosecuting and hanging by the neck every judge, DA, lawyer and politician of the land who allows this to go on!

Judges have no place in Grand Juries nor in Criminal Trials! The Founders knew corruption and they gave us all the tools to live lives of liberty free of unwarranted government intrusion. However, none of those liberties will be enjoyed by a populous who does not even know what the law is and who refuses to stand up with their fellow citizens and be the government that they are. This is a Nation government by we the people not they the government! You form Grand Juries, go out form them and shut down these public servants who have made themselves our sovereigns!

See: CopperCards County Cleanup Program for more details.

Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence is more relevant today than it was two hundred years ago.

Liberty For life

C