Liberty For Life Association

     C Jefferson

Liberty For Life

CONTENTS

Support our advertisers

Hire STRATEGIZE.com

The World's Leading Strategic Consultancy

STRATEGIZE CONSULTANCY


The Earth Pan

LFL Founder Out Of Hiding With Extraordinary Solution to fix
Government:
Peopleisim.org

Peopleisim


The Construct of Live & Origin of Everything - Soulisim

Soulisim



MenuVert
Support Adverts it helps cover costs. Ads randomly generated by advertising companies:

ADVERTISE HERE:

 

InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED / CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED

Claims 9, 10 Treason, Misprision of Felony

First Claim For Relief    Treason – Jeremy Fogel

PLAINTIFFS:

All PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS: 

JEREMY FOGEL, Jeremy Fogel,

Jon Doe’s, 1 to n.

VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS

On multiple occasions, including on or about September 9, 2005, January 27, 2006, March 3, 2006, July 12, 2006, July 21, 2006, October 3, 2006, September 12, 2006 and September 13, 2006, in the above named Judicial District, the crime of TREASON, in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1, a felony, was committed by JEREMY FOGEL, who did willfully and unlawfully commit TREASON.  JEREMY FOGEL having knowledge of the law and the fact that PLAINTIFFS in U.S. District Court San Jose case number C07 00391 had filed said case under the 11th Amendment in which said case was filed not only against JEREMY FOGEL’s employer but also his colleagues and that said case was filed by citizens of another State across state borders against the State and thus in accordance with not only due process, but also in accordance with the 11th Amendment of the United States Constitution JEREMY FOGEL had no Judicial power in said case and JEREMY FOGEL thus exceeded subject matter jurisdiction by making rulings in a case in which Judicial power was clearly prohibited JEREMY FOGEL acted under color of state and or territorial law.

U.S. Constitution, Eleventh Amendment: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”  

JEREMY FOGEL did Breach his Duty and exceeded subject matter jurisdiction in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1.  “Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 .Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

Let the JURY NOTE: JEREMY FOGEL proceeded to not only assume jurisdiction when he had none, he went on to ignore extremely serious felonies committed against PLAINTIFFS including false arrest, assault, attempted murder, kidnap and JEREMY FOGEL allowed the continued kidnap of RCB and WFB.  As a DEFENDANT in the afore mentioned Federal case, JEREMY FOGEL, exceeded subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed the case against himself and his co-conspirators and even dismissed the case against DEFENDANTS who had made no appearance what so ever.  JEREMY FOGEL’s actions were willful and malicious. 

DAMAGES

As a proximate consequence of the willful and malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation, lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity, damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with one’s own children!

As a consequence of the willful and malicious actions of JEREMY FOGEL/Jeremy Fogel, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained extraordinary damage in a sum certain amount of $66,016,803,250.00.

Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES” section of this Complaint.

AUTHORITIES

AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following AUTHORITIES:

18 U.S.C. Section 1 “Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 .Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

First Claim For Relief Misprision Of Felony – Jeremy Fogel

PLAINTIFFS:

All PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS: 

JEREMY FOGEL, Jeremy Fogel,

Jon Doe’s, 1 to n.

VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS

On multiple occasions, including on or about September 9, 2005, January 27, 2006, March 3, 2006, July 12, 2006, July 21, 2006, October 3, 2006, September 12, 2006 and September 13, 2006, in the above named Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by JEREMY FOGEL, who did willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF FELONY, JEREMY FOGEL having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple felonies cognizable by a court of the United States committed against Plaintiffs, said JEREMY FOGEL did conceal and did not make as soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in civil or military authority under the United States, JEREMY FOGEL did Breach his Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law.  Said multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous having been clearly stated and identified with evidence in pleadings before JEREMY FOGEL, said felonies including but not limited to false arrest, assault, attempted murder, kidnap and treason.

Substantial information having been placed before JEREMY FOGEL showing said felonies having been committed by JEREMY FOGEL in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case Number C 05-00996 JF

DAMAGES

As a proximate consequence of the willful and malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation, lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity, damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with one’s own children!

Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “J.  DAMAGES” section of this Complaint.

AUTHORITIES

AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are incorporated herein by reference..

MenuVert

The Earth Plan's Peopleisim  is THE Solution to the Worlds Problems do IT!
It's time to shut down the Pedophiles & Lucifer Worshipers who sacrifice children - please visit & support Veterans For Child Rescue.
Liberty For Life can not endorse any adverts below as they are randomly generated by advertising companies.