|
|
InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Sixth Claim For Relief Misprision of Felony – Irwin Joseph
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
IRWIN JOSEPH, Irwin Joseph
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple occasions, including on or about
10/09/2007, 07/23/2007, 01/06/2006, 12/28/2005, 10/20/2005, in the above
named Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by IRWIN JOSEPH, who did
willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF FELONY, IRWIN JOSEPH
having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple felonies
cognizable by a court of the United States committed against Plaintiffs,
said IRWIN JOSEPH did conceal and did not make as soon as possible known
the same to some judge of other person in civil or military authority
under the United States, IRWIN JOSEPH did Breach his Duty and acted
under color of state or territorial law. Said multiple felonies
committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous having been clearly
stated and identified in pleadings before DEFENDANT, said felonies
including but not limited to attempted murder, kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
IRWIN JOSEPH showing said felonies having been committed against
PLAINTIFFS as shown in U.S. District Court San Jose case number C05
00996 JF RS which was provided to IRWIN JOSEPH.
Commissioner IRWIN JOSEPH not only intentionally
ignored felonies committed against PLAINTIFFS, without subject matter
jurisdiction he actively enjoined in the malicious prosecution of
PLAINTIFFS and unlawfully fined PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred for simply
seeking his constitutional rights. IRWIN JOSEPH’s actions are criminal
in nature and form and shock the conscience.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business and prosperity, damaged reputation including
both slander and libel, interference with the pursuit of happiness, loss
of domestic tranquility, loss of general welfare, and the loss of basic
liberties such as enjoying life with one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Seventh Claim For Relief Treason – Irwin Joseph
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
IRWIN JOSEPH, Irwin Joseph
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple occasions, including on or about
10/09/2007, 07/23/2007, 01/06/2006, 12/28/2005, 10/20/2005, 01/25/2008
in the above named Judicial District, the crime of TREASON, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1, a felony, was committed by IRWIN JOSEPH, who did
willfully and unlawfully commit TREASON. IRWIN JOSEPH having knowledge
of the law and the fact that PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred never gave IRWIN
JOSEPH general subject matter jurisdiction but only narrowly limited
jurisdiction to hand back Clive Boustred’s passport which the Santa Cruz
Superior Court has unlawfully taken from Clive Boustred, IRWIN JOSEPH
acted under color of state or territorial law and Breached his Duty and
exceeded subject matter jurisdiction in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section
1.
Let the JURY NOTE: Irwin Joseph proceeded to not
only assume jurisdiction when he had none, he went on to maliciously
prosecute PLAINTIFFS by continuing to hold RCB and WFB hostage, but also
to prevent PLAINTIFFS from access to PLAINTIFFS capital thereby
destroying new businesses PLAINTIFFS had started and incurring
significant unnecessary financial expense, hardship and anguish. Irwin
Joseph’s actions were willful and malicious.
IRWIN JOSEPH has gone as far as continuing to rule
and issue orders in PLAINTIFFS Clive Boustred, RCB and WFB cases when he
has been properly served and is an active DEFENDANT in cases properly
filed against himself by these PLAINTIFFS. IRWIN JOSEPH”S disregard
for the law and extreme bias extends to such extreme levels that he
literally dismissed serious criminal charges and Verified Criminal
Complaints filed against his co-conspirator Anamaria Tichatschke, he did
that without even addressing one single count of the twenty two counts
brought against Anamaria Tichatschke for her repeated and blatant
violations of court orders, perjury and false 911 calls. The fact that
IRWIN JOSEPH is not even a Judge makes his actions all the more
reprehensible.
IRWIN JOSEPH repeatedly insisted on presiding over
PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred, RCB and WFB’s Santa Cruz Superior Court Case
FL 16028 when IRWIN JOSEPH had no subject matter jurisdiction in that
case, and he went as far as to consistently refused to enforce
Stipulated Court Orders and Agreements refusing to allow PLAINTIFF Clive
Boustred to remover DEFENDANT Anamaria Tichatschke from title to Clive
Boustred’s home in accordance with Stipulated Court Orders and even
refusing to allow Clive Boustred to refinance his home so as to be able
to pay off Credit Cards at high interests. IRWIN JOSEPH was repeatedly
put on notice regarding his Treason and the consequential damages he was
causing by consistently refusing to allow PLAINTIFF’S any right to a
speeding trial.
DEFENDANT IRWIN JOSEPH’S knowledge of the law is
entirely lacking, he is utterly unqualified to preside over any case.
IRWIN JOSEPH does not even know what the United States Constitution
dictates. While IRWIN JOSEPH’S complete lack of knowledge of the law is
a serious problem, his sheer incompetence of basic fairness and ethics
is a far greater problem, the man would not even be suitable to decide
on children’s squabble in kindergarten.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
IRWIN JOSEPH’S arrogant treason has caused
PLAINTIFFS significant interest charges on loans that PLAINTIFFS
incurred entirely as a result of IRWIN JOSEPH’S refusal to follow the
law and Stipulated Court Orders and Agreements. IRWIN JOSEPH is liable
for all the additional interest PLAINTIFFS incurred in addition to the
associated lost business etc.
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
18 U.S.C. Section 1 “Whenever a judge acts where
he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act
or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66
.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404,
5 L.Ed 257 (1821). |
