InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
TROY B. OVERTON/Troy B. Overton
PAUL T. HAMMERNESS/Paul T. Hammerness
EDMUND G. BROWN/Edmond G. Brown/STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL/Attorney General
of The State of California/ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about February 14 & 20, 2008, in U.S District
Court, San Jose the above listed DEFENDANTS committed the crime of
Misprision of Felony against PETITIONERS. Said DEFENDANTS did file
“IRWIN JOSEPH’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS WITH MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [FRCP 12(B)(5)]” and
“[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT IRWIN JOSEPH’S MOTION TO
DISMISS]”. DEFENDANT IRWIN JOSEPH (Irwin Joseph) is a serious criminal
engaged in TREASON, MISPRISION OF FELONY, KIDNAP, RACKETEERING, LARCENY
and other crimes. The Attorney General and his deputies have a duty to
prosecute IRWIN JOSEPH not defend the criminal actions of this serious
criminal who is acting under the color of law.
There are no provisions in the U.S. or Californian
Constitutions for the government to defend criminals. To the contrary,
the construct of U.S. Constitution and its government is to prosecute
criminals. The Attorney Generals office has no right to take the
people’s money an defend criminal actions by government officials, and
even far less to attempt to have criminal charges brought against
government officials thrown out of court on technicalities or fraudulent
and misleading claims.
When the Attorney General and his officers engage
in covering up or defending criminal actions by government employees the
Attorney General and those officers and or employees of ‘We the People’
engage in the crime itself and automatically becomes guilty of
Misprision of Felony under U.S. Title 18.
Failure of the government to enforce U.S. Title 18
will only ensure that the government will continuously grow into a
criminal enterprise where criminals in government defend criminals in
government, and our government will spiral out of control as is the case
today.
Today the United Stats Government is the most
criminal out of control government in the entire world, literally
illegally invading other nations and slaughtering and murdering millions
of innocent people, causing the worlds worst ecological disasters and
even launching murderous attacks against its own people. Today the
United States Government is not only the leading Police State and
Criminal Enterprise, the U.S. government seriously threatens the very
existence of life on earth by causing such outrageous and enormous
ecological disasters such as literally spraying millions of gallons of
highly toxic poisons around the world, by dumping millions of gallons of
toxic poisons in the oceans and by blasting thousands of tons of Nuclear
Waste into nations around the world. The intensive development of
biological weapons and other weapons of mass destruction and the massive
buildup of these weapons of mass destruction and the open and outrageous
criminal use of weapons of mass destruction by the government of the
United States of America threatens every person, animal and plant in the
entire world.
According to reliable sources, the new Attorney
General of The United States of America is a serious criminal who is
directly connected to international and national crime syndicates and
the Mob. Attorney General Michael Murkaze is also directly implicated
in the government’s cover-up of the murder of three thousand citizens in
the government’s attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on 9/11,
in that Mrukaze literally handed the 9/11 co-conspirator Larry
Silversteen billions of dollars.
By the government defending criminal actions of
criminals in government, the government has become a den of thieves, a
house of murderers and a serious and real threat to life on earth.
By failing to prosecute IRWIN JOSEPH and by
utilizing the people’s funds to defend criminal actions by IRWIN JOSEPH,
the above listed DEFENDANTS committed MISPRISION OF FELONY under USC
Title 18.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Additional Businesses PLAINTIFF founded which have
been damaged as a consequence of the failure of the above listed
DEFENDANTS failure to prosecute IRWIN JOSEPH are Santa Cruz Cats, Life
Yacht, CopperCards, Le Essence, Pangea Estates.
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Title 18
U.S.C. § 4. MISPRISION OF FELONY. “Whoever, having knowledge of the
actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United
States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to
some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the
United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than three years, or both.”
Title 18
U.S.C.A. 242 (U.S. Criminal Code) "Whoever, under color of law, statute,
or ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitants
of any state to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution or Law of the United States. .
. shall be fined no more than $1,000 or imprisoned one year or both."
Title 18
U.S.C.A. 241, 242 are the criminal equivalent of Title 42 U.S.C.A. 1983,
1985 et seq. "Judges have no immunity from prosecution for their
judicial acts." - BRADLEY V. FISHER, U.S. 13 Wall. 335 (1871)
"When a judge
acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person of his
constitutional rights, he exercises no discretion or individual
judgment; he acts no longer as a judge, but as a "minister" of his own
prejudice." - PIERSON V. RAY, 386 U.S. 547 at 567 (1967)
|
