Liberty For Life Association

     C Jefferson

Liberty For Life


Support our advertisers


The World's Leading Strategic Consultancy


The Earth Pan

LFL Founder Out Of Hiding With Extraordinary Solution to fix


The Construct of Life & Origin of Everything - Soulisim


LibertyForLife on Patreon

LibertyForLife Store

Make your New Years
Resolution a Revolution
Your Support
Is Greatly Appreciated




Forty Fifth Claim For Relief    Fraud by Santa Cruz Sheriffs & DA




MICHAEL MACDONALD, Michael Macdonald,

AMY CHRISTY, Amy Christy,

M POOL, M Pool,

HEMMINGWAY, Hemmingway (deceased)

BOB LEE, Bob Lee (Santa Cruz District Attorney)

STEVE DROTTAR, Steve Drottar

Jon Doe’s, 1 to n.


On or about March 10, 2003, the above listed DEFENDANTS committed Fraud when partaking in the assassination attempt on Clive Boustred, said defendants fraudulently and criminally made false and fraudulent accusations against Clive Boustred following the failed assassination attempt against Clive Boustred on March 10, 2003.   Said fraudulent claims included but were not limited to fraudulently accusing Clive Boustred of committing multiple felonies including the fraudulent claim in the PURSUIT REPORT CHP 187A (New 1-03) OPI 051, Number – Other Agency Use Only: 03-2349, wherein said report claimed in section 22. “ORIGINAL VIOLATION OBSERVED BY AGENCY INITIATING THE PURSUIT” was a Felony pursuant to Section & Code: 278.5 P.C.  Said PURSUIT REPORT was made the fraudulent claim that the reason the Sheriffs pursued Clive Boustred was that he had committed a Felony PC 278.5 PC (see EXHIBITS 3/SC06858/Persuit Report - and original reason for pursuit PC 278.jpg)

To put in perspective hour utterly outrageous and criminal in nature and intent the fraud committed by the Santa Cruz Sheriffs in falsely accusing Clive Boustred of a PC 278.5 which states “278.5.  (a) Every person who takes, entices away, keeps, withholds, or conceals a child and maliciously deprives a lawful custodian of a right to custody”, just before the sheriffs literally attempted to blow Clive Boustred’s head off in front of his children, it must be noted by the JURY that Clive Boustred was following the law and had properly filed a Temporary Restraining Order in the Santa Cruz Superior Court just before these criminals acting under the color of the law setup an ambush to assassinate Clive Boustred in front of his children.  Mr. Boustred had full legal custody of his children and was acting in the best interest of the children, especially following Anamaria Tichatschke abandoning WFB aged three at the time, in the middle of a learner ski run the day before and Steffan Tichatschke’s attempt on that occasion to assault Clive Boustred when Steffan Tichatschke in violation of the Stipulated Court order governing the custody of the children came into contact with the children for the express purpose of assaulting Mr. Boustred.

The JURY must note that the Sheriffs who filed this blatantly fraudulent allegation that Mr. Boustred had committed a Felony PC 278.5 were fully aware that Mr. Boustred had lawfully filed a TRO and was not in any violation of custody orders.  These same sheriffs who filed the report were made fully aware that Stefan Tichatschke and Anamaria Tichatschke had committed serious child endangerment the day before when they abandoned WFB in the middle of a learner ski run.

These sheriffs fraud was committed with malicious intent to defraud the truth and to falsely accuse an innocent man and to cover up their failed assassination attempt on Mr. Boustred’s life.  The Sheriffs were in complete violation of the law and completely failed to obtain the necessary warrants to enter Mr. Boustred’s private property. And said Sheriffs had absolutely no legal right or reason to peruse Clive Boustred.



Damage to PLAINTIFFS stemming from reliance on said misrepresentation placed in said fraudulent PURSUIT REPORT the above listed DEFENDANT/S intentionally concealed facts and failed to disclose facts including the fact that Clive Boustred never violated any laws.  The above listed DEFENDANT/S had a fiduciary duty to disclose said facts and DEFENDANT/S had a fiduciary duty to not lie or make a false and fraudulent PURSUIT REPORT and the above listed DEFENDANT/S knew this fact and legal principle.

Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES” section of this Complaint, including all the resulting damages such as kidnap, and destruction of PLAINTIFFS’ businesses.


AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following AUTHORITIES:

278.5.  (a) Every person who takes, entices away, keeps, withholds, or conceals a child and maliciously deprives a lawful custodian of a right to custody, or a person of a right to visitation, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, or two or three years, a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or both that fine and imprisonment.

   (b) Nothing contained in this section limits the court's contempt power.

   (c) A custody order obtained after the taking, enticing away, keeping, withholding, or concealing of a child does not constitute a defense to a crime charged under this section.


If you appreciate the extraordinary effort put into please
click here to support us on Patreon

Wearing the brand is more than a fashion statement, it’s not only cool and sexy, you’re supporting a revolution for truth and liberty. Wear it with pride.

Make your New Years Resolution a Revolution.

The Earth Plan's Peopleisim  is THE Solution to the Worlds Problems do IT!