InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Forty First Claim For
Relief Violation of U.S. Const. Article III
Judicial Department Responsibility
PLAINTIFFS:
All Plaintiffs
DEFENDANTS:
All DEFENDANTS who are members of the Judiciary
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1: The judicial Power of the
United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such
inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and
establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall
hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated
Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be
diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section 2… The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment,
shall be by Jury;
DEFENDANT Art Danner, rated as Not Qualified by the
California Judicial Nominations Committee was in blatant violation of
the U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1, allowed to preside as a
judge in the Santa Cruz Superior Court. Art Danner's criminal past was
and is well published and know and specifically made know by Plaintiff
to DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANTS failed to act in accordance with the law and
caused extraordinary violations against Plaintiffs.
DEFENDANT JAMES WARE is nationally renowned for the
lies he told which raised him to a position where he was appointed as a
judge. Also known as “Lying Judge Ware”, JAMES WARE is categorically not
qualified to be a judge, however, he is allowed to preside over some of
the most significant and serious cases filed in the court. JAMES WARE
not only presided without subject matter jurisdiction over PLAINTIFFS
cases, he does so over every case that his brought before him.
PLAINTIFFS witnessed JAMES WARE dismissing a Depleted Uranium case that
was brought before him where the court had the opportunity of literally
preventing a continued nuclear holocaust and the most heinous deaths of
not only many civilians but what will be millions of our own soldiers.
Far more than a million U.S. troops are disabled largely from the use of
Depleted Uranium.
DEFENDANTS Art Danner (Deceased) Trilla E. Bahrke
both failed to give Plaintiff Clive Boustred a Trial by Jury and instead
corrupted the process so that the trial was not by jury but by a
corrupted mix of trial by judge and jury where the jury was not allowed
to make decisions at law or in regard to evidence in accordance with the
Constructional guarantee said judge and commissioner committed crimes
which make void their good standing.
DEFENDANT IRWIN JOSEPH is not even a judge, however
he insists on presiding over PLAINTIFFS cases when PLAINTIFF has
specifically denied such and demanded a qualified judge. PLAINTIFF
narrowly allowed in writing JOSEPH to hand PLAINTIFF back his passport
that the Court had illegally taken, however, JOSEPH and other judges
claim that this narrow defined simple function authorizes the
unqualified and criminally intended IRWIN JOSEPH to preside over
PLAINTIFFS cases commissioner IRWIN JOSEPH is in bad standing and
violated PETITIONERS constitutionally guaranteed rights.
DEFENDANTS JEREMY FOGEL, JAMES WARE, IRWIN JOSEPH,
SAMUEL S. STEVENS, MICHAEL E. BARTON all flat out refused to allow
PLAINTIFFS any trial what so ever.
All above listed DEFENDANTS are sitting in bad
behavior due to multiple treasonous and outrageous violations of the
construct of the Constitution committed by said DEFENDANTS as listed
herein and in the rest of this claim dictate that these criminals be
immediately removed from the bench and office and prosecuted for said
violations.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
Said damages include the sum certain amounts of $66,016,803,250.00 and
$3,001,000.00 from the prior lawsuits filed by PLAINTIFFS.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES: |
