InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Fortieth Claim For
Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 7th Amendment [Trial
by Jury, Common Law]
7th Amendment: In Suits at common
law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the
right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a
jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States,
than according to the rules of the common law.
PLAINTIFFS:
All Plaintiffs
DEFENDANTS:
IRWIN JOSEPH, Irwin Joseph
JEREMY FOGEL, Jeremy Fogel,
JAMES WARE, James Ware
SAMUEL S. STEVENS, Samuel S. Stevens
MICHAEL E. BARTON, Michael E.
Barton
ART
DANNER, Art Danner (deceased)
TRILLA E. BAHRKE, Trilla E. Bahrke
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, Phyllis J. Hamilton
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, County of Santa Cruz
STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, State of California
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States of America
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
Starting from March 10, 2003 to present, in the
above named Judicial District, DEFENDANTS listed above repeatedly
violated PETITIONERS 7th Amendment Right to a Trial By Jury,
DEFENDANTS listed above, who did willfully and unlawfully under the
color of law commit said crime / action. Of the two cases the
government took to trial, FL 06858 and CT 72-002045, both trials were
such extraordinarily and outrageous shams that they failed to be Trials
By Jury, but were instead trials by a judge and commissioner
respectively where said judge and commissioner acted criminally and
prevented all the substantial evidence proving Clive Boustred’s
innocence from getting before the jury and where they specifically
prevented and even struck Clive Boustred’s testimony and any important
argument in his defense that proved his innocence. The Courts have flat
out refused to give PETITIONERS any Trial By Jury which is Petitioners
right under the 6th and 7th Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States of America.
See Opening Briefs for Santa Cruz Superior Court
Case FL 16028, F 06858, and CV 148542, Placer County Superior Court case
Ct 72-002045 and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case Numbers C 05-00996 and C07 00391
included in the Exhibits CD and incorporated herein by reference.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
Said damages include the sum certain amounts of $66,016,803,250.00 and
$3,001,000.00 from the prior lawsuits filed by PLAINTIFFS.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES: |
