|
|
InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Thirty Third Claim For
Relief Public Nuisance
All Plaintiffs
DEFENDANTS:
All DEFENDANTS
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about March 10, 2003 and repeatedly up to the
present time, in the above named Judicial District, the crime of PRIVATE
AND PUBLIC NUISANCE, in violation of Common Law and the Constitution of
the United States of America and the 1st, 2nd, 4th,
5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th,
10th, 13th, 14th Amendments thereto,
was committed by DEFENDANT/S listed above, who did willfully and
unlawfully commit said crimes and civil violations.
A suit for nuisance may be supported by any of the
three DEFENDANTS mental states: (1) intentional interference with
PLAINTIFFS rights; (2) negligence; or (3) abnormally dangerous activity
or other conduct giving rise to strict liability.
From a Public Nuisance perspective, the harm caused
to the public at large is both the threat of violence from Sheriffs.
DEFENDANTS actions in bringing outrageous lawsuits against Clive
Boustred imposes a general and significant public nuisance and threat at
large, imposed on each and every individual who simply lives within
California. The actions by DEFENDANTS are legal terrorist threats
against any person who simply gets divorced or lives in California,
DEFENDANTS behavior is baseless and immoral and not only terrorizes the
public at large but kills any persons desire to get married. The crime
committed by DEFENDANTS amongst other crimes is Malicious Prosecution.
From a Private Nuisance perspective, DEFENDANTS
imposed an unreasonable interference with Clive Boustred, RCB and WFB on
their land. By illegally entering and shooting at PLAINTIFFS which is
abnormally dangerous, the DEFENDANTS forced the destruction of business
Clive Boustred ran and the complete elimination of PLAINTIFFS right to
Justice, ensuring domestic conflict, eliminating PLAINTIFFS common
defense, and demoting PLAINTIFFS general Welfare, and the Blessings of
Liberty and eliminating PLAINTIFFS Posterity. DEFENDANTS represent
everything the Constitution was established to eliminate, DEFENDANTS are
the essence and epitome of a PUBLIC and PRIVATE NUISANCE
It is alleged that DEFENDANTS actions were
intentional as they previously engaged in abnormally violent activity
and they imposed a highly likely abnormally dangerous situation. The
violence caused by DEFENDANTS not only destroyed the basic right to
enjoy basic liberty on ones’ own land, the DEFENDANTS have made Clive
Boustred, and the public at large fearful of enjoying their lives free
of violent and intrusive government intervention.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business and prosperity, damaged reputation including
both slander and libel, interference with the pursuit of happiness, loss
of domestic tranquility, loss of general welfare, and the loss of basic
liberties such as enjoying life with one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES: |
