|
|
InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Twenty First Claim For
Relief Treason – James Ware
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANT:
JAMES WARE, James Ware
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple occasions, including on or about March
19, 2007; April 9, 2007; April 25, 2007, May 7, 2007 and June 4, 2007,
in the above named Judicial District, the crime of TREASON, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1, a felony, was committed by JAMES WARE, who did
willfully and unlawfully commit TREASON. JAMES WARE having knowledge of
the law and the fact that PLAINTIFFS in U.S. District Court San Jose
case number C07 00391 had filed said case under the 11th
Amendment in which said case was filed not only against JAMES WARE’s
employer but also his colleagues and that said case was filed by
citizens of another State across state borders against the State and
thus in accordance with not only due process, but also in accordance
with the 11th Amendment of the United States Constitution
JAMES WARE had no Judicial power in said case and JAMES WARE thus
exceeded subject matter jurisdiction by making rulings in a case in
which Judicial power was clearly prohibited JAMES WARE acted under color
of state or territorial law.
U.S. Constitution, Eleventh Amendment: “The
Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to
any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the
United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects
of any Foreign State.”
JAMES WARE did Breach his Duty and exceeded subject
matter jurisdiction in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1. “Whenever a
judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is
engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216,
101 S.Ct. 471, 66 .Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6
Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
Let the JURY NOTE: JAMES WARE proceeded to not only
assume jurisdiction when he had none, he went on to ignore extremely
serious felonies committed against PLAINTIFFS including false arrest,
assault, attempted murder, kidnap and JAMES WARE allowed the continued
kidnap of RCB and WFB. The above listed DEFENDANT did then without
subject matter jurisdiction issue a void order dismissing the above
mentioned Federal suit against his employer and colleagues. JAMES
WARE’s actions were willful and malicious.
Let the JURY also NOTE: In a case heard before
PLAINTIFFS case on or about April 9, 2007 in which JAMES WARE had
subject matter jurisdiction, JAMES WARE in that case claimed he had no
subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed that case. That case was
brought against the Nuclear Regulatory body by a real party of interest
in an attempt to prevent the further use of Nuclear Waist or Depleted
Uranium in weapons by the U.S. military. Let the Jury note that largely
as a consequence of the U.S. military’s use of Depleted Uranium in
weapons, as many as one point two MILLION U.S. Gulf War Veterans are
disabled and birth defects in Iraq are up 600%. The United States
falsely accused Iraq of possessing Weapons of Mass Destruction then
illegally invaded that nation using Weapons of Mass Destruction against
that Nation, its people and also exposing or own soldiers to the Weapons
of Mass Destruction the U.S. used and continues to use. JAMES WARE who
was given an opportunity to halt the use of these horrific Weapons of
Mass Destruction that are harming millions of people around the world,
including our own troops and civilians, chose to dismiss that case.
See JAMES WARE’S orders dated October 3, 2006,
September 12, 2006 and September 13, 2006 in UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case
Number C07 00391.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
As a consequence of the willful and malicious
actions of the above listed DEFENDANT/S, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum certain amount of $3,001,000.00.
AUTHORITIES
Extensive AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON
AUTHORITIES” are incorporated herein by reference.
Twenty Second Claim
For Relief
Misprision Of Felony – James Ware
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANT:
JAMES WARE, James Ware
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about January 18, 2007; January 25, 2007;
February 26, 2007; March 19, 2007; April 9, 2007, April 25, 2007; May 7,
2007 and June 4, 2007, in the above named Judicial District, the crime
of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony,
was committed by JAMES WARE, who did willfully and unlawfully commit
MISPRISION OF FELONY, JAMES WARE having knowledge and evidence of the
commission multiple felonies cognizable by a court of the United States
committed against Plaintiffs, said JAMES WARE did conceal and did not
make as soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in
civil or military authority under the United States, JAMES WARE did
Breach his Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law. Said
multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous
having been clearly stated and identified in pleadings before JAMES
WARE, said felonies including but not limited to false arrest, assault,
attempted murder, kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
JAMES WARE showing said felonies having been committed in U.S. District
Court San Jose case number C07 00391.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
As a consequence of the willful and malicious
actions of the above listed DEFENDANT/S, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum certain amount of $3,001,000.00.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference.
Twenty Third Claim For
Relief
Misprision Of Felony – Attorney General & Santa Cruz County Sheriffs,
Counsel & Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
BILL LOCKYER, Bill Lockyer (Former California State
Attorney General)
PAUL T HAMMERNESS, Paul T Hammerness (Deputy
Attorney General)
TROY B. OVERTON, Troy B. Overton (Deputy Attorney
General)
SAMUEL S. STEVENS, Samuel S. Stevens
MICHAEL E. BARTON, Michael E.
Barton
ART DANNER, Art Danner (Deceased)
ROBERT B. ATACK, Robert B. Atack
JON N. ANTON, Jon N. Anton
JASON M. HEATH, Jason M. Heath (Assistant County
Counsel, Santa Cruz)
DANA MCRAE, Dana McRae (County Counsel, Santa Cruz)
MARK TRACY, Mark Tracy (Former Sheriff)
MICHAEL MACDONALD, Michael Macdonald (Deputy
Sheriff)
M POOL, M Pool (Deputy Sheriff)
HEMMINGWAY, Hemmingway (deceased)
AMY CHRISTY, Amy Christy
BROZOZOWSKI, Brozozowski
M. MCCONNELL/M. McConnell
BOB LEE, Bob Lee (Santa Cruz District Attorney)
STEVE DROTTAR, Steve Drottar
ANGELA GLASS, Angela Glass
RAVEN HARRIS, Raven Harris,
TROY B. OVERTON/Troy B. Overton
BARRY BASKIN/Barry Baskin
Santa Cruz Board of Directors
ELLEN PIRIE/Ellen Pirie
JAN BEAUTZ/Jan Beautz
MARK W. STONE/Mark W. Stone
NEAL COONERTY/Neal Coonerty
TONY CAMPOS/Tony Campos
M. M. SCHROEDER/M. M. Schroeder
John Does 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple dates starting on or about March 10,
2003 to present, in the above named Judicial District, the crime of
MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was
committed by DEFENDANTS, who did willfully and unlawfully commit
MISPRISION OF FELONY, DEFENDANTS having knowledge and evidence of the
commission multiple felonies cognizable by a court of the United States
committed against Plaintiffs, said DEFENDANTS did conceal and did not
make as soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in
civil or military authority under the United States, DEFENDANTS did
Breach their Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law.
Said multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous
having been clearly stated and identified in pleadings before
DEFENDANTS, said felonies including but not limited to false arrest,
assault, attempted murder, kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
DEFENDANTS showing said felonies having been committed by DEFENDANTS in
multiple court cases.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Twenty Fourth Claim
For Relief
Misprision Of Felony – Phyllis J. Hamilton
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, Phyllis J. Hamilton
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about July 5, 2005, May 6, 2005, August 10,
2005, September 13, 2005 and December 5 , 2005 in the above named
Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation of 18
U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, who
did willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF FELONY, PHYLLIS J.
HAMILTON having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple
felonies cognizable by a court of the United States committed against
Plaintiffs, said PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON did conceal and did not make as
soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in civil
or military authority under the United States, PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON did
Breach her Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law. Said
multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous
having been clearly stated and identified in pleadings before PHYLLIS J.
HAMILTON, said felonies including but not limited to attempted murder,
kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON showing said felonies having been committed by
DEFENDANTS in U.S. District Court San Jose case number C0500995 - PJH.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Twenty Fifth Claim For
Relief Misprision Of Felony – Troy B. Overton
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
TROY B OVERTON, Troy B Overton
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about August 8, 2006 and on other dates in
the above named Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by TROY B.
OVERTON, who did willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF FELONY,
TROY B. OVERTON having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple
felonies cognizable by a court of the United States committed against
Plaintiffs, said TROY B. OVERTON did conceal and did not make as soon as
possible known the same to some judge of other person in civil or
military authority under the United States, TROY B. OVERTON did Breach
her Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law. Said
multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous
having been clearly stated and identified in pleadings before TROY B.
OVERTON, said felonies including but not limited to attempted murder,
kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
TROY B. OVERTON showing said felonies having been committed by
DEFENDANTS in U.S. District Court San Jose case number C0500996.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
M. M. SCHROEDER, M. M. Schroeder
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On of about February 8, 2007 in United States Court
of Appeals for the Ninth District case number 06-89076 in the above
named Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by M. M. SCHROEDER
(Chief Judge), who did willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF
FELONY, M. M. SCHROEDER having knowledge and evidence of the commission
multiple felonies cognizable by a court of the United States committed
against Plaintiffs, said M. M. SCHROEDER did conceal and did not make as
soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in civil
or military authority under the United States, M. M. SCHROEDER did
Breach her Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law. Said
multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous
having been clearly stated and identified in pleadings before M. M.
SCHROEDER, said felonies including but not limited to attempted murder,
kidnap and treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
M. M. SCHROEDER showing said felonies having been committed by
DEFENDANTS in U.S. District Court San Jose case number C0500996.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Twenty Seventh Claim
For Relief
Misprision Of Felony – TRILLA E. BAHRKE
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
TRILLA E. BAHRKE, Trilla E. Bahrke
CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN, Christopher M. Cattran
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple occasions including on or about
September 3, 2003, September 3, 2003 and in the Judicial District of
Placer County California, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in
violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by TRILLA E.
BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN, who did willfully and unlawfully
commit MISPRISION OF FELONY, TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN
having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple felonies
cognizable by a court of the United States committed against Plaintiffs,
said TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN did conceal and did not
make as soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in
civil or military authority under the United States, TRILLA E. BAHRKE
and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN did Breach their Duty and acted under color
of state or territorial law. Said multiple felonies committed against
Plaintiffs being most grievous having been clearly stated and identified
in pleadings before TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN, said
felonies including but not limited to attempted murder, kidnap and
treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN showing said felonies having
been committed by DEFENDANTS in SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PLACER Case No. 72-002045
TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M. CATTRAN not
only intentionally ignored and concealed serious felonies that were
committed against PETITIONERS, TRILLA E. BAHRKE and CHRISTOPHER M.
CATTRAN jointly actively engaged in maliciously prosecuting PETITIONERS
under the color of law.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Twenty Eighth Claim
For Relief
Misprision Of Felony, Alienation of Parental, Kidnap – William Kelsay
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
WILLIAM M. KELSAY, William M. Kelsay
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
HRG ON OSC RE REQUEST TO TAKE CHILDREN TO FAMILY
REUNION FILED BY CLIVE BOUSTRED
04/14/2006
PETITIONERS REQUEST TO TAKE THE MINORS TO
PENNSYLVANIA FOR A FAMILY REUNION IS DENIED.
On or about April 14, 2006, in the above named
Judicial District, the crime of MISPRISION OF FELONY, in violation of 18
U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony, was committed by WILLIAM M. KELSAY, who did
willfully and unlawfully commit MISPRISION OF FELONY, WILLIAM M. KELSAY
having knowledge and evidence of the commission multiple felonies
cognizable by a court of the United States committed against Plaintiffs,
said WILLIAM M. KELSAY did conceal and did not make as soon as possible
known the same to some judge of other person in civil or military
authority under the United States, WILLIAM M. KELSAY did Breach his Duty
and acted under color of state or territorial law. Said multiple
felonies committed against Plaintiffs being most grievous having been
clearly stated and identified in pleading before DEFENDANT, said
felonies including but not limited to attempted murder, kidnap and
treason.
Substantial information having been placed before
DEFENDANT showing said felonies having been committed by DEFENDANTS in
U.S. District Court San Jose case number C05 00996 JF RS.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:
Twenty Ninth Claim For
Relief
Misprision Of Felony – Jeff Almquist
PLAINTIFFS:
All PLAINTIFFS
DEFENDANTS:
JEFF ALMQUIST, Jeff Almquist
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about July 4, 2007, in Santa Cruz Superior
Court PETITIONER Clive Boustred filed “MOTION TO OBTAIN COPIES OF
GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS” for the purpose of prosecuting felonies committed
against Clive Boustred, and “ORDERS TO SHOW CAUSE” and “MOTIONS TO
DISMISS CASE.” in Santa Cruz Superior Court Case F 06858, in the above
named Judicial District, the hearings were brought before Judge JEFF
ALMQUIST who did under the color of law commit the crime of MISPRISION
OF FELONY, in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 4, a felony. JEFF
ALMQUIST, who did willfully and unlawfully under the color of law commit
MISPRISION OF FELONY, JEFF ALMQUIST having knowledge and evidence of the
commission multiple felonies cognizable by a court of the United States
committed against Plaintiffs, said JEFF ALMQUIST did conceal and did not
make as soon as possible known the same to some judge of other person in
civil or military authority under the United States, JEFF ALMQUIST did
Breach his Duty and acted under color of state or territorial law and
did conceal said felonies. JEFF ALMQUIST not only committed MISPRISION
OF FELONY he actively refused to dismiss a clearly fraudulent and
malicious case when clear and convincing evidence of said fraud was put
before him. Said multiple felonies committed against Plaintiffs being
most grievous, including but not limited to attempted murder, kidnap and
treason. JEFF ALMQUIST not only breached his duty un 18 U.S.C. Section
4, he refused to allow PLAINTIFF the right to obtain copies of
government exhibits used in a sham trial against PLAINTIFF so that
PLAINTIFF could prosecute the Deputy Sheriff who had attempted to murder
PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred and who nearly murdered PLAINTIFFS RCB and WFB.
Substantial information having been placed before
JEFF ALMQUIST showing said felonies having been committed by DEFENDANTS
in Santa Cruz Superior Court Case F 06858.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES:. |
