|
|
InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Seventeenth Claim For
Relief Violation of U.S. Const. 1st Amendment Freedom
of Speech
U.S. Constitution, Amendment II: “A well regulated
Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of
the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
PLAINTIFFS:
Clive Boustred, RCB and WFB
DEFENDANTS:
DENNIS J. KEHOE (State
Bar 34687), Dennis J. Kehoe
Dennis Kehoe Law Corp.
JOHN A. CHRISTERSON (CA
State Bar 889096), John A. Christerson
LEONARD DUECK (VP Twin
Lakes Baptist Church, Inc.), Leonard Dueck
Twin Lakes Baptist
Church, Inc.
MARK SPURLOCK, Mark
Spurlock
Paula Simmons
County of Santa Cruz
State of California
Judge Paul R. Burdick
Jon Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On or about October 18, 2007, John A. Christerson
(CA State Bar 889096), Dennis J. Kehoe (State Bar 34687), Leonard Dueck
(VP Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc.) filed a “CH-100 Request for Order
to Stop Harassment” seeking the following: That “Clive Boustred is not
allowed to contact or communicate with any students and/or families
and/or employees of Twin Lakes Christian School or Twin Lakes Church by
telephone, letter, electronic communication or otherwise.”. Said
lawsuit was filed in violation of Petitioner Clive Boustred, RCB and
WFB’s First Amendment rights. On October 18, 2007, Judge Paul R.
Burdick issued an order restricting Petitioner Clive Boustred from
communicating with four thousand members of the Church where Clive
Boustred is a member or from entering the property of said Church. Twin
Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. filed to have the case heard on Halloween.
The Case was brought before the Honorable Judge Robert Atack. The court
found insufficient evidence to support the issuance of any restraining
order and the order restraining Clive Boustred was dissolved.
In January of 2008 Paula Simmons instructed RCB
that he may not exercise free speech and ordered RCB to not talk about
the government and associated current events. Paula Simmons not only
violated RCB’s right to free speech, she set such a poor example for a
child of learning age oppressing an eleven year old child is hardly
admirable, especially when the adult is incompetent of answering the
child’s legitimate and well constructed questions regarding facts and
issues relating to current government. Teaching children about the
tremendous Constitution of the United States of America is something
teachers should aspire to and not silence.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are
incorporated herein by reference in addition to the following
AUTHORITIES. |
