InfoTelesys Lawsuit: I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED /
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED
Eleventh Claim For Relief Conspiracy
PLAINTIFFS:
All Plaintiffs
DEFENDANTS:
All DEFENDANTS
Jon
Doe’s, 1 to n.
VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS
On multiple dates before and on March 10, 2003 to
present, in the above named Judicial District, the crime of CONSPIRACY,
in violation of Common Law and the Constitution of The United States of
America, a felony, was committed by DEFENDANTS, who did by implied
actions or willfully and unlawfully commit CONSPIRACY against
PLAINTIFFS. Said actions by conspirators make up concerted CONSPIRACY
against PLAINTIFFS which reached common objectives and thus infers said
agreement by DEFENDANTS to commit CONSPIRACY. DEFENDANTS were fully
aware that their concerted actions would cause damage to PLAINIFFS.
Overt and blatant criminal acts were intentionally undertaken by certain
DEFENDANTS as a concerted part of the multiplicity of CONSPIRACY to
commit crimes against PLAINTIFFS.
A well established international conspiracy to form
a New World Order obtained control of the U.S. Dollar in 1913.
As confirmed by multiple sources, said conspirators set about to
establish communism in the United States and other Nations.
DEFENDANTS have enjoined in that well established conspiracy and have
committed crimes against PLAINTIFFS which are an integral part of said
New World Order conspiracy, including the implementation of a Police
State in the United States; the claim made by DEFENDANT judges and DA’s
in this case that the Sate holds the position of head of family and is
authorized to take children from their custodial parent and modify
Stipulated Custody Agreements and Orders which is in conformance with
said conspiracy’s implementation of socialism/communism; the loaning to
PLAINTIFFS money that co-conspirators created out of nothing and then
the charging PLAINTIFFS usurious interest rates on said money (Banking
DEFENDANTS having charged PLAINTIFFS interest rates as high as 30%); the
denials of Constitutionally protected rights in conformance with said
conspiracy’s implementation of socialist fascism / communism within the
U.S. amongst other crimes committed which further the goals of said
conspiracy which have included the malicious prosecution of PLAINTIFFS
so as to silence PLAINTIFFS ability to defend themselves and said
CONSPIRACY had prevented PLAINTIFFS from deploying and developing
technology and products that threaten said conspiracy.
By kidnapping PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred’s children
RCB and WFB while maliciously prosecuting Clive Boustred, conspirators
emulate a pattern and practice employed by the New World Order
conspirators in Communist U.S.S.R. under Stalin. PLAINTIFFS have been
refused any opportunity to depose any of said individuals and it is
believed and assumed and alleged that they are part of the conspiracy
against PLAINTIFFS.
In addition Santa Cruz Superior Court Presiding
Judge for 2007, Heather D. Morse, is added as a DEFENDANT in this cause
of action as it is alleged and believed and proven that she has actively
conspired against Clive Boustred by committing misprision of treason by
refusing to prosecute and act of Treason Committed by Irwin Joseph. On
or about August 1, 2007 Clive Boustred formally filed a Notice of
Treason and proof of said Treason against Irwin Joseph, whom by self
admission admitted guilt of Treason when Irwin Joseph who was sued by
Clive Boustred insisted on presiding over Santa Cruz Superior Court Case
FL 16928 where Clive Boustred was the Plaintiff. As Presiding Judge,
Heather D. Morse not only had a duty to remove Irwin Joseph from
presiding over a case in which he has a clear personal interest and
bias, Morse had lawful responsibility and duty to remove Irwin Joseph
from the bench. Defendant BARRY BASKIN enjoined in said conspiracy to
keep commissioner IRWIN JOSEPH presiding over Clive Boustred’s divorce
case where IRWIN JOSEPH consistently conspired without any subject
matter jurisdiction to deny Clive Boustred his legal rights, despite
IRWIN JOSEPH admitting that he had been sued by Clive Boustred, said
BARRY BASKIN concluded that IRWIN JOSEPH was not biased and that as a
commissioner IRWIN JOSEPH was entitled to preside over Clive Boustred’s
divorce case when Clive Boustred had stipulated that he required a
qualified judge and not a commissioner.
DEFENDANTS VICKI PARRY, ANAMARIA TICHATSCHKE and
IRWIN JOSEPH having repeatedly refused to allow PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred
the right to access his own capital and refinance his home did conspire
to inflict usurious interest rates against PLAINTIFFS, when said
DEFENDANTS were specifically and directly advised repeatedly and on
multiple occasions that Clive Boustred was being subject to usurious
interest rates as a direct consequence of their refusal to follow the
law and lawful court orders.
Multiple requests to Banking DEFENDANTS to reduce
usurious interest rates were repeatedly denied.
Further evidence of the formation and ongoing
conspiracy against Clive Boustred by parties listed is extensive and
irrefutable and included in the attached Exhibit DVD. The formation of
the conspiracy occurred before the Santa Cruz Sheriffs setup ambush to
murder Clive Boustred on March 10 2003.
PLAINTIFF need only allege and believe said
conspiracy exists in order to bring the matter to trial, the judgment
and consideration of said evidence being the mater to be tried in a
Trial by Jury only. PLAINTIFFS not only allege and believe this to be
the case, PLAINTIFFS incorporate evidence herein proving said
conspiracy, see Exhibit Liberty For Life Dot.Bomb Conspiracy News DVD
Chapter 1: which includes the recorded claim by DEFENDANT Anamaria
Tichatschke (formerly Anamaria Boustred) that her lawyer Vicky Parry
knew all the judges in the court and could effectively do anything just
prior to the assassination attempt on Clive Boustred’s life; Evidence
includes the seven maliciously prosecuted cases filed against Clive
Boustred by Santa Cruz authorities following the attempted murder, with
such outrageous malicious prosecution as sentencing Clive Boustred to
six months in jail for driving 27 miles per hour along his own private
road and filing a felony charge against Clive Boustred for this
non-crime; ordering Clive Boustred to not communicate with his children
for three years; amongst a hoard of other outrageous false and malicious
prosecutions against Clive Boustred which shocks the conscience. Said
evidence is incorporated in files on the DVD in the Liberty For Life
v15\abuse folder and in the EXHIBITS DVD which are incorporated herein
by reference as if part of the whole of this document.
Proof of the formation and operation of the
conspiracy against Clive Boustred is well established and irrefutable in
addition to multiple wrongful acts done pursuant to the conspiracy with
extreme damage resulting which includes but is not limited to the
extreme damage to Clive Boustred’s corporations InfoTelesys, Inc. Get IT
Real, Inc. and other business ventures and corporations established by
Clive Boustred including Liberty For Life Association, Life Yachts,
CopperCards, Santa Cruz Cats, Le Essence and the literal kidnap of Clive
Boustred’s children.
The corporate persons who are PLAINTIFFS in this
suit have been prevented from conducting business as a consequence of
the malicious prosecution of PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred, the founder,
Chairman, CEO and key person of said corporate persons.
PLAINTIFFS also allege and believe that other SLAP
suits field against Clive Boustred, including but not limited to Santa
Cruz Superior Court CASE NO. FL 16028, filed by DEFENDANTS JOHN A.
CHRISTERSON, DENNIS J. KEHOE, LEONARD DUECK, Twin Lakes Baptist Church,
Inc. and MARK SPURLOCK are also a part of a conspiracy to maliciously
prosecute PLAINTIFFS Clive Boustred, Liberty For Life Association and
CopperCards and their efforts to eliminate corruption in government and
to expose and eliminate the New World Order conspiracy.
As further evidence of the blatant and obvious
conspiracy against PLAINTIFFS is the fact that both the State of
California and the United States of America have repeatedly refused to
allow PLAINTIFFS to bring any of the many serious charges and claims
that PLAINTIFFS have backed up with substantial irrefutable evidence
which included admissions of guilt by some of the DEFENDANTS, to trial.
However, the State of California has filed as many as seven false and
frivolous cases against PLAINTIFF Clive Boustred an has repeatedly
allowed their utterly unsubstantiated cases to be brought to trial where
the State gave Clive Boustred such absurdly sham trials that said trials
could be used as classroom examples of how utterly corrupt a trial can
become when the government appoints criminals to the bench and office.
The Opening Briefs and Habeas Corpus’ filed in said cases are
incorporated herein by reference and attached to the EVIDENCE DVD
included with this case as part of the evidence of said conspiracy.
Additionally DEFENDANTS have displayed deliberate
indifference to the rights of plaintiffs, and, based upon the principles
set forth in Monell v. New York City Department of Social Services , 436
U.S. 658 (1978), are thereby liable for all injuries and damages
sustained by plaintiff as set forth in this complaint.
Further evidence relating to said conspiracy is
incorporated in each of the other Claims for Relief’s “VIOLATION OF
CIVIL RIGHTS & ULTIMATE FACTS” section and incorporated herein by
reference.
DAMAGES
As a proximate consequence of the willful and
malicious actions of DEFENDANTS, PLAINTIFF’S have sustained
extraordinary damage in a sum to be determined per proof, including
severe and extreme emotional stress and anguish, parental alienation,
lost time, lost business investments, lost business and prosperity,
damaged reputation including both slander and libel, interference with
the pursuit of happiness, loss of domestic tranquility, loss of general
welfare, and the loss of basic liberties such as enjoying life with
one’s own children!
Said damages include the sum certain amounts of $66,016,803,250.00 and
$3,001,000.00 from the prior lawsuits filed by PLAINTIFFS in this court.
PLAINTIFFS seek additional punitive damages in the sum certain amount of
one point four trillion dollars against DEFENDANTS (The amount this
criminal government has spent so far in invading and assaulting the
Nation of Iraq).
Damages incurred by Plaintiffs as a direct or
indirect consequence to the above mentioned and referenced actions by
DEFENDANTS are also incorporated herein as listed in the “K DAMAGES”
section of this Complaint.
AUTHORITIES
AUTHORITIES in
section “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” are incorporated herein by reference in
addition to the following AUTHORITIES:
The elements of a
civil conspiracy are:
• the formation and
operation of the conspiracy
• the wrongful act or
acts done pursuant the conspiracy, and
• the damage
resulting.
The making of a
conspiracy does not, by itself, vest the victim with a cause of action
against the conspirators. Rather, the existence of a conspiracy may
render additional parties liable for the wrong.
Therefore, in order
to state a cause of action against a conspirator based on the actions of
another conspirator, the plaintiff must allege a cause of action based
on those actions
and must allege (1) the formation and operation of the conspiracy,
(2) the wrongful acts
done pursuant to the conspiracy, and
(3) the damage
resulting from such acts.
“A conspirator is
responsible for the acts of other conspirators who have left the
conspiracy before he joined it, or joined after he left it; statutes of
limitations tolled for previous acts when each new act is done” - US v.
GUEST, 86 S.Ct. 1170; US V.COMPAGNA, 146 F.2d 524.
. |
