InfoTelesys Lawsuit: Synopsis of Case
This case is brought against
DEFENDANTS for continued kidnap, racketeering, treason and other
charges, in addition to force collection on two earlier cases filed by
plaintiffs. The Clerk of the court refused to issue summary judgments
on the earlier suits after the failure to appear of any of the
DEFENDANTS in those cases. This case brings new charges that were not
brought in the previous cases.
The government has literally
attempted to blow Plaintiff Clive Boustred’s head off in front of his
children and repeatedly thrown him in jail under absurdly false
charges. They have given him pathetically sham hearings and trials and
have kidnapped and held hostage his children for nearly five years while
locking down Mr. Boustred’s finances so as to prevent him from defending
himself or effectively holding any of the DEFENDANTS accountable for the
outrageous crimes that shock the conscience committed against
Plaintiffs.
While taking Mr. Boustred to trial
after trial for absurd false criminal charges that don’t meet any of the
constructs of a crime, and for which there never was any evidence of any
crime being committed and for which Mr. Boustred had substantial
evidence proving his innocence, the Courts continue to refuse to allow
Mr. Boustred to take government employees to trial for legitimate, well
established and proven serious and outrageous criminal charges.
As a direct and proximate cause of
crimes committed by DEFENDANTS against Plaintiff, companies Plaintiff
Clive Boustred founded, chaired and ran have been destroyed. Mr.
Boustred had developed next generation internet (InfoTelesys, Inc.) that
not only ushered in new education systems which had the potential of
significantly reducing world hunger by providing people the means to
education, but also had the potential of eliminating the core construct
to corruption in the United States and the World at large, namely
providing alternate banking infrastructure to that provided by the
privately held Federal Reserve Bank and New World Order oligarchy. A
banking infrastructure where non interest baring money would be employed
to facilitate transactions and commerce and not where interest on money
is employed as it is by the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank and New
World Order oligarchy to initiate and cause depressions and wars.
In this case, we will put forward
evidence showing that the Federal Reserve Bank owners, lead by the
Rothschild’s, embarked on a world dominance plan that has been the
underlying cause of the major wars and depressions for the last century
and the implementation of communism / socialism in the U.S. and other
nations. It is these socialist/communist principals which completely
oppose the construct of the U.S. Constitution and underlying English
Common Law that have been employed by criminals working for the State to
assault Plaintiffs.
Following the first government
assaults of Plaintiffs, new companies founded by Mr. Boustred, including
Kite Yacht, Life Yacht, Le Essence and CopperCards have also been
eliminated by the continued criminal behavior of the courts and their
refusal to follow the most rudimentary and principal laws and
fundamental decency.
The government who violently
kidnapped Mr. Boustred’s children continues to hold them hostage and
continues to lock up Mr. Boustred’s assets while bankers charge usurious
interest rates on money Mr. Boustred has had to borrow in order to
survive.
Plaintiffs have been denied
Justice while the government instigated domestic conflict and eliminated
Plaintiffs common defense and destroyed Plaintiffs general Welfare,
while taking way the Blessings of Liberty and Posterity from
Plaintiffs. The government has ignored all the constructs and
limitations placed on them by the Constitution of the United States of
America and even international law. The government has made mixed war
against Plaintiffs.
The government has sold out the
Nations currency to international bankers who now easily master and
control the government, the economy and military industrial complex.
The government has literally given the private bankers the right to add
as many U.S. Dollars to their bank account as they want without paying
anything for the money other than printing costs if the money is
printed. As a consequence, these international banksters, principal of
whom are the Rothschild’s, have implemented communism and oppression in
the U.S. They have instigated wars and depressions so as to allow
themselves to steal assets and land through fraud and the misfortune of
their victims.
These agents of the Rothschild’s and
international bankers have implemented in the United States of America a
classic showcase of the Hegelian Dialectic process that instigates
conflict in order to take advantage of change that is ensured by
instigating wars and depressions.
These agents of the Rothschild’s and
international bankers have appointed liars and criminals as Presidents,
Vice Presidents, Judges, Attorney Generals and other official State
positions. They have implemented a Court system that entertains cases
filed by criminals and dismisses legitimate cases filed by honest and
decent citizens, a court system that acquits the guilty and convicts the
innocent, a court system which claims government officials cannot be
held accountable no matter what crime they commit. A court system that
claims that “they the State” are supreme and sovereign, the head of our
families and our “god”. These government employees who act as agents
for the Rothschild’s New World Order oligarchy have committed treason of
the worst kind, bringing effective slavery and oppression not only on
themselves but on their children and their children’s children and
future generations.
This insanity and greed of government
officials has brought the United States of America into war after war
and depression after depression. This Nation should be leading the
world and not enslaving it.
However, we live at the cusp of a new
renaissance where the great printing press of the Internet is exposing
the banking sham and the conspiracy of the New World Order oligarchy,
and where Internet promises to usher in a new era of education and
prosperity to mankind. Let us open our eyes and make it so instead of
letting greed drive corruption in our Nation.
-
Have you brought any other
lawsuits in a federal court while a prisoner:
o
Yes
x
No
-
If your answer to “1.” is
yes, how many?
Petitioners have filed two
previous lawsuits relating to these matters in the San Jose U.S.
District Court. Petitioners won both of those lawsuits as a simple
matter pursuant to TITLE 28—APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default (a), (b)(1).
The court however refused to follow due process or the law in those
cases and this lawsuit is filed to enforce collection on those earlier
lawsuits in addition to brining new claims not addressed in those
earlier lawsuits.
1. Is there a grievance
procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your
current complaint occurred?
x
Yes
x
No
2. Have you filed a grievance
concerning the facts relating to your current complaint?
xYes
o
No
If your answer is no, explain
why not
3. Is the grievance procedure
completed? xYes
o
No
If your answer is no, explain
why not
On March 9, 2005, in San Jose U.S.
District Court, Mr. Boustred filed suit against nine judges, seven cops,
four District Attorneys and other government employees, lawyers, his ex
Anamaria and her lover Stefan Tichatschke (Case # C05 000996). In more
than a year and a half of hearings in that case, not a single defendant
dared to make any appearance or even pick up pen and paper and deny the
many serious charges brought against them. Plaintiffs won that suit
pursuant to TITLE 28—APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
FEDERAL CLAIMS: TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default:
(a) Entry. When
a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has
failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that
fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter
such party's default.
(b) Judgment.
Judgment by default may be entered as follows:
(1) By the
Clerk. When the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for a sum
certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain, the clerk
upon request of the plaintiff and upon affidavit of the amount due shall
enter judgment for that amount and costs against the defendant, if
the defendant has been defaulted for failure to appear and if
the defendant is not an infant or incompetent person.
On or about January 18, 2007,
Plaintiffs filed a second case for the fourth false arrest of Mr.
Boustred on March 20, 2006. Defendant Judge Jeremy Fogel had dismissed
Plaintiffs 1st Lawsuit after a year and a half of hearings
making the ridiculous and absurd claim that the Torts under which
Plaintiff had filed his claims were not claims upon which relief could
be granted. Mr. Fogel claimed that attempted murder, kidnap, grand
theft auto, libel, slander, malicious prosecution, conspiracy, trespass,
fraud, and violations of 1st, 2nd, 4th,
5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th,
11th and 14th Amendments and other laws were not
‘claims upon which relief could be granted’. Frankly Mr. Boustred in
his extensive international career has not seen anything as ridiculous
as this claimed by anyone in a relatively senior position. To counter
such absurdities in the 2nd lawsuit, Plaintiffs filed, a
carbon copy of a successfully filed U.S. District Court San Jose lawsuit
for the same false arrest charges, excepting for names and places and
minor details, was filed by Plaintiffs. This second case was brought
before Judge James Ware.
At the first hearing in this second
U.S. District Court Case Mr. Ware indicated that he would issue a
summary judgment if the police officer who had falsely arrested Mr.
Boustred did not make any appearance. However, between hearings before
the next scheduled hearing, Mr. Ware quietly dismissed Plaintiffs second
case, also claiming such absurdities as Mr. Fogel.
Clearly the Courts, knowing that they
will loose the case are breaking the law and flat out refusing
PLAINTIFFS any right to trial by jury or any trial for that matter,
knowing that by simply unlawfully dismissing the case they can keep the
case under JUDICIAL POWER indefinitely. However, according to their own
law under Title 28, PLAINTIFFS by law have won these cases.
Plaintiffs filed the 1st
and 2nd Lawsuits under the 11th Amendment
eliminating any Judicial Power. Plaintiffs won the cases pursuant to
TITLE 28 (APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS:
TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default). Plaintiffs and had no path
other than through the duty of the Clerk of The Court’s Duty under Title
28 Rule 55 (b)(1) to award Summary Judgment, which was denied by the
Clerk. Any Appeal through the Judiciary would be just moot as the void
dismissals issued by Fogel and Ware since there is no Judicial Power in
this case brought against the State and judiciary.
Plaintiffs move again in this case to
enforce collection and summary judgment on the first two cases
Plaintiffs field. Naturally Statutes of Limitation do not apply to this
case where the government is employing the courts to delay and deny
justice.
In the Santa Cruz Superior Court,
Commissioners and Judges Plaintiffs successfully sued still insist on
presiding over Mr. Boustred’s divorce case, refusing to allow that case
to move forward now for five and a half years. These judges and
commissioner have also refused to enforce lawfully Stipulated Agreements
and Orders and have prevented Mr. Boustred from even refinancing his own
home, forcing Mr. Boustred to borrow money on credit cards whom have now
proceeded to charge Mr. Boustred 30% interest on balances. New
companies Plaintiffs started have also now been destroyed as a
consequence. While the judges and commissioner issued and upheld
blatantly void and illegal orders, including criminal void orders
kidnapping Mr. Boustred’s children, they went as far as to continuously
sanction and fine Mr. Boustred in blatant violations of rules of court
and the law and reflecting such baseless criminal behavior unbefitting
of the bench.
The net result of the completely out
of control behavior of the Courts and government officials has been that
instead of building the next generation Internet and education systems
InfoTelesys had developed, Mr. Boustred has been forced into five and a
half years of defending himself from criminal assaults made by the
government, and close to five years attempting to get his kidnapped
children back. The government has Made Mixed War against Mr. Boustred
and his children and is doing the same to many citizens in this Nation.
Mr. Boustred, who has worked at the
forefront of technology and lead the industry in many areas, undertook
an extensive investigation of the nature and cause of the government
Making Mixed War against himself and other citizens. Many of these
findings are published on the Liberty For Life Association website at
http://www.libertyforlife.com
The underlying or root cause to the
extraordinary corruption in the government in the United States can be
traced to the fraud and crimes committed during the Woodrow Wilson
Presidency in 1913 when private individuals and foreigners were granted
the exclusive “franchise” of the U.S. dollar also referred to as
“banksters” and or “Agents of the Rothschild’s” and “New World Order”
herein. Principle of these foreigners who hijacked the dollar is the
Rothschild family whose World Dominance plan was formally completed by
Whitehouse on May 1, 1776 (May Day).
Earlier assumption of Lincoln’s War
debt by these banksters can also reveals their underlying Hegelian
Dialectic meddling in that devastating war which to this day 90% of U.S.
citizens have no idea what the so-called “Civil War” was fought over.
Most citizens even believe Lincoln was honest.
See
http://www.libertyforlfie.com/constitution/politicians/dishonest_abe.htm
|
