|
Plaintiffs, USDC: _________________Trial By Jury
With Good Cause Plaintiffs bring this suit before the United States District Court in San Jose for Trial By Jury. Having been literally shot at by the government, repeatedly falsely arrested, given sham trials and sentenced to absurd sentences for non crimes, having had his children literally violently kidnapped and held hostage and having has as many as seven of his businesses destroyed by the government, and having repeatedly been refused any right to address grievances, to satisfy exhaustion of remedies, PLAINTIFFS bring new matters and matters that the courts refused to address to the court in an attempt to find integrity in the courts. Complaint submitted under duress, without the means to afford counsel as a consequence of nearly five years of outrageous malicious prosecution that shocks the conscience. INDEX
JURY NOTICE[1]: Just as the courts consider kidnap a serious offense punishable even by death, PLAINTIFF’S also consider it in the same light. Let it be judicially noticed that the government has violently and unlawfully kidnapped Plaintiff Clive Boustred’s children RCB and WFB and has held them hostage for nearly five years. The Courts have consistently and abrasively refusing to follow the Law, Code and Rules, while maliciously assaulting and falsely prosecuting Plaintiff. What must be done when a good and peaceful person such as Clive Boustred files in a U.S. Courts a plea “that I have been shot at had my children kidnapped and have been maliciously prosecuted to cover up, please help!” and cannot get any relief what so ever, other than more severe abuse from the government? The government who after attempting to murder Clive Boustred literally violently kidnapped Clive Boustred’s children RCB and WFB and handed his children to Mr. Boustred’s adulterous ex wife and former Personals Assistant Stefan Tichatschke a man and woman of ill repute, despite a lawful stipulated custody agreement and order dictating that Tichatschke may have no contact with RCB and WFB. The government repeatedly threw Clive Boustred in jail under absurdly false charges wile locking down Clive’s finances so that he could not afford to defend himself. To this day the government continues to hold RCB and WFB hostage from their dad Clive Boustred. Clive is the custodial parent, and RCB and WFB used to live with him. The maliciousness of the government extended to ordering Clive to not communicate with his boys for three years. A. PARTIES1. Clive Frank Boustred, 2. RCB (Minor son of Clive Frank Boustred) 3. WFB (Minor son of Clive Frank Boustred) 4. InfoTelesys, Inc. Nevada and Nevis 5. Get IT Real, Inc. Nevada and Nevis 6. Life Yacht. Nevis 7. CopperCards. California 8. Santa Cruz Cats. California 9. Le Essence. Nevis. 10. Kite Yachts. Nevis 1. Defendant Michael Macdonald resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 2. Defendant Samuel S. Stevens resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 3. Defendant Steve Drottar resides or works at Santa Cruz District Attorneys Office, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Ass. DA. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 4. Defendant Anamaria Tichatschke (Formerly Anamaria Boustred) resides or works at 33250 Fairway Ave, Soquel, CA 95073 as a house keeper The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual o official capacity. 5. Defendant Steffan Tichatschke resides or works at 33250 Fairway Ave, Soquel, CA 95073 as an investor The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual o official capacity. 6. Defendant Vicki J. Parry resides or works at 100 Doyle Street, Suite G, Santa Cruz CA 95062 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar 80508. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 7. Defendant Mark Tracy and Santa Cruz Sheriffs resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 8. Defendant Art Danner (Deceased) resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 9. Defendant M Pool resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 10. Defendant Hemmingway (Deceased) resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Lieutenant Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 11. Defendant Amy Christy resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Sergeant Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 12. Defendant Brozozowski resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 13. Defendant Bob Lee resides or works at Santa Cruz District Attorneys Office, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a District Attorney. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 14. Defendant Michael E. Barton resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 15. Defendant Gregor Guy Smith resides or works at 214 Duboce Ave, San Francisco, CA 94103-1008 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 16. Defendant Paul Meltzer resides or works at Water Street, Santa Cruz CA 95060 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 17. Defendant Trilla E. Bahrke resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145 as a Superior Court Commissioner. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 18. Defendant Bill Doyle resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145-5609 as a Ass. District Attorney. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 19. Defendant Christopher M. Cattran resides or works at 2501 North Lake Blvd, P.O. Box 5609, Tahoe City, CA 96145-5609 as a Ass. District Attorney. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 20. Defendant Barbara J. Fox resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Clerk of the Court. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 21. Defendant Griffin resides or works at Santa Cruz Sheriffs, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Deputy Sheriff. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 22. Defendant Robert Frandeen resides or works at 125 Water Street, Suite C, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 23. Defendant Raven Harris resides or works at Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Child Protective Services. 100 Pioneer Street P.O. Box 1320, Santa Cruz, CA 95061 The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 24. Defendant Angela Glass resides or works at Santa Cruz Santa Cruz Child Protective Services. 100 Pioneer Street P.O. Box 1320, Santa Cruz, CA 95061 The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity.
25.
26. Defendant Robert B. Atack resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 27. Defendant Genworth Financial resides or works at representation at 1299 Ocean Avenue, Suite 900, Santa Monica, CA 90401-1000 as insurance agents The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 28. Defendant Attorney General of The State of California resides or works at P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 as Attorney General of The State of California The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): ¨ individual x official capacity. 29. Defendant Irwin Joseph resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Commissioner. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 30. Jason M. Heath and Santa Cruz County and Santa Cruz County resides or works at Santa Cruz County 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as an Attorney The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 31. Defendant Phyllis J. Hamilton and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant. Resides or works at 450 Golden Gate Ave, San Francisco, CA 940102 as a U.S. District Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 32. Defendant Jeremy Fogel and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant as a United States District Court Judge. Resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Judge The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 33. Defendant William M. Kelsay Resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Retired Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 34. Defendant Jeff Almquist Resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Retired Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 35. Defendant Heather Morse Resides or works at Santa Cruz Superior Court, 701 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 as a Retired Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 36. Defendant Barry Baskin Resides or works at Contra Costa County Superior Court, Contra Costa CA. as a Superior Court Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 37. Defendant M. M. SCHROEDER and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant. Resides or works at United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth District, San Francisco as Chief Judge. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 38. Defendant James Ware and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant. Resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Judge The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 39. Richard W. Wieking and the Government and associated entities of United States of America responsible for instituting the position and acts of said Defendant. Resides or works at the U.S. District Court 280 S. 1st Street, San Jose, CA as a United States District Court Clerk The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 40. Defendant Dennis J. Kehoe resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 41. Defendant Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 a corporation. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 42. Defendant John A. Christerson resides or works at Dennis J. Kehoe Law Corp. 311 Bonita Drive, Aptos, CA 95003 as an Officer of the court and member of the State Bar. The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 43. Defendant Mark Spurlock resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as an Administrator The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 44. Defendant Leonard Dueck resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as Vice President The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 45. Defendant Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 a corporation The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 46. Defendant Chase Card Services of Wilmington Delaware. resides or works at P.O. Box 15298 Wilmington DE 19850-6600a corporation The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 47. Defendant TROY B. OVERTON, Troy B. Overton resides or works at P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 as Deputy Attorney General of The State of California The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. 48. Defendant Paula Simmons resides or works at Twin Lakes Baptist Church, Inc. School 2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos CA 95003 as School Principle The defendant is sued in his/her (Check one or both): x individual x official capacity. B. SYNOPSIS OF CASEThis case is brought against DEFENDANTS for continued kidnap, racketeering, treason and other charges, in addition to force collection on two earlier cases filed by plaintiffs. The Clerk of the court refused to issue summary judgments on the earlier suits after the failure to appear of any of the DEFENDANTS in those cases. This case brings new charges that were not brought in the previous cases. The government has literally attempted to blow Plaintiff Clive Boustred’s head off in front of his children and repeatedly thrown him in jail under absurdly false charges. They have given him pathetically sham hearings and trials and have kidnapped and held hostage his children for nearly five years while locking down Mr. Boustred’s finances so as to prevent him from defending himself or effectively holding any of the DEFENDANTS accountable for the outrageous crimes that shock the conscience committed against Plaintiffs. While taking Mr. Boustred to trial after trial for absurd false criminal charges that don’t meet any of the constructs of a crime, and for which there never was any evidence of any crime being committed and for which Mr. Boustred had substantial evidence proving his innocence, the Courts continue to refuse to allow Mr. Boustred to take government employees to trial for legitimate, well established and proven serious and outrageous criminal charges. As a direct and proximate cause of crimes committed by DEFENDANTS against Plaintiff, companies Plaintiff Clive Boustred founded, chaired and ran have been destroyed. Mr. Boustred had developed next generation internet (InfoTelesys, Inc.) that not only ushered in new education systems which had the potential of significantly reducing world hunger by providing people the means to education, but also had the potential of eliminating the core construct to corruption in the United States and the World at large, namely providing alternate banking infrastructure to that provided by the privately held Federal Reserve Bank and New World Order oligarchy. A banking infrastructure where non interest baring money would be employed to facilitate transactions and commerce and not where interest on money is employed as it is by the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank and New World Order oligarchy to initiate and cause depressions and wars. In this case, we will put forward evidence showing that the Federal Reserve Bank owners, lead by the Rothschild’s, embarked on a world dominance plan that has been the underlying cause of the major wars and depressions for the last century and the implementation of communism / socialism in the U.S. and other nations. It is these socialist/communist principals which completely oppose the construct of the U.S. Constitution and underlying English Common Law that have been employed by criminals working for the State to assault Plaintiffs. Following the first government assaults of Plaintiffs, new companies founded by Mr. Boustred, including Kite Yacht, Life Yacht, Le Essence and CopperCards have also been eliminated by the continued criminal behavior of the courts and their refusal to follow the most rudimentary and principal laws and fundamental decency. The government who violently kidnapped Mr. Boustred’s children continues to hold them hostage and continues to lock up Mr. Boustred’s assets while bankers charge usurious interest rates on money Mr. Boustred has had to borrow in order to survive. Plaintiffs have been denied Justice while the government instigated domestic conflict and eliminated Plaintiffs common defence and destroyed Plaintiffs general Welfare, while taking way the Blessings of Liberty and Posterity from Plaintiffs. The government has ignored all the constructs and limitations placed on them by the Constitution of the United States of America and even international law. The government has made mixed war against Plaintiffs. The government has sold out the Nations currency to international bankers who now easily master and control the government, the economy and military industrial complex. The government has literally given the private bankers the right to add as many U.S. Dollars to their bank account as they want without paying anything for the money other than printing costs if the money is printed. As a consequence, these international banksters, principal of whom are the Rothschild’s, have implemented communism and oppression in the U.S. They have instigated wars and depressions so as to allow themselves to steal assets and land through fraud and the misfortune of their victims. These agents of the Rothschild’s and international bankers have implemented in the United States of America a classic showcase of the Hegelian Dialectic process that instigates conflict in order to take advantage of change that is ensured by instigating wars and depressions. These agents of the Rothschild’s and international bankers have appointed liars and criminals as Presidents, Vice Presidents, Judges, Attorney Generals and other official State positions. They have implemented a Court system that entertains cases filed by criminals and dismisses legitimate cases filed by honest and decent citizens, a court system that acquits the guilty and convicts the innocent, a court system which claims government officials cannot be held accountable no matter what crime they commit. A court system that claims that “they the State” are supreme and sovereign, the head of our families and our “god”. These government employees who act as agents for the Rothschild’s New World Order oligarchy have committed treason of the worst kind, bringing effective slavery and oppression not only on themselves but on their children and their children’s children and future generations. This insanity and greed of government officials has brought the United States of America into war after war, and depression after depression. This Nation should be leading the world and not enslaving it. However, we live at the cusp of a new renaissance where the great printing press of the Internet is exposing the banking sham and the conspiracy of the New World Order oligarchy, and where Internet promises to usher in a new era of education and prosperity to mankind. Let us open our eyes and make it so instead of letting greed drive corruption in our Nation. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS
Petitioners have filed two previous lawsuits relating to these matters in the San Jose U.S. District Court. Petitioners won both of those lawsuits as a simple matter pursuant to TITLE 28—APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default (a), (b)(1). The court however refused to follow due process or the law in those cases and this lawsuit is filed to enforce collection on those earlier lawsuits in addition to brining new claims not addressed in those earlier lawsuits. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES1. Is there a grievance procedure available at the institution where the events relating to your current complaint occurred? x Yes x No
2. Have you filed a grievance concerning the facts relating to your current complaint? xYes o No If your answer is no, explain why not
3. Is the grievance procedure completed? xYes o No If your answer is no, explain why not
1ST LAWSUIT – U.S. Dist. Ct. Case # C05 000996On March 9, 2005, in San Jose U.S. District Court, Mr. Boustred filed suit against nine judges, seven cops, four District Attorneys and other government employees, lawyers, his ex Anamaria and her lover Stefen Tichatschke (Case # C05 000996). In more than a year and a half of hearings in that case, not a single defendant dared to make any appearance or even pick up pen and paper and deny the many serious charges brought against them. Plaintiffs won that suit pursuant to TITLE 28—APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default: (a) Entry. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter such party's default. (b) Judgment. Judgment by default may be entered as follows: (1) By the Clerk. When the plaintiff's claim against a defendant is for a sum certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain, the clerk upon request of the plaintiff and upon affidavit of the amount due shall enter judgment for that amount and costs against the defendant, if the defendant has been defaulted for failure to appear and if the defendant is not an infant or incompetent person. 2nd LAWSUIT – U.S. Dist. Ct. Case # C07 00391On or about January 18, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a second case for the fourth false arrest of Mr. Boustred on March 20, 2006. Defendant Judge Jeremy Fogel had dismissed Plaintiffs 1st Lawsuit after a year and a half of hearings making the ridiculous and absurd claim that the Torts under which Plaintiff had filed his claims were not claims upon which relief could be granted. Mr. Fogel claimed that attempted murder, kidnap, grand theft auto, libel, slander, malicious prosecution, conspiracy, trespass, fraud, and violations of 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th and 14th Amendments and other laws were not ‘claims upon which relief could be granted’. Frankly Mr. Boustred in his extensive international career has not seen anything as ridiculous as this claimed by anyone in a relatively senior position. To counter such absurdities in the 2nd lawsuit, Plaintiffs filed, a carbon copy of a successfully filed U.S. District Court San Jose lawsuit for the same false arrest charges, excepting for names and places and minor details, was filed by Plaintiffs. This second case was brought before Judge James Ware. At the first hearing in this second U.S. District Court Case Mr. Ware indicated that he would issue a summary judgment if the police officer who had falsely arrested Mr. Boustred did not make any appearance. However, between hearings before the next scheduled hearing, Mr. Ware quietly dismissed Plaintiffs second case, also claiming such absurdities as Mr. Fogel. Clearly the Courts, knowing that they will loose the case are breaking the law and flat out refusing PLAINTIFFS any right to trial by jury or any trial for that matter, knowing that by simply unlawfully dismissing the case they can keep the case under JUDICIAL POWER indefinitely. However, according to their own law under Title 28 PLAINTIFFS by law have won these cases. The Net Result of Continued Criminal Behavior By Government OfficialsPlaintiffs filed the 1st and 2nd Lawsuits under the 11th Amendment eliminating any Judicial Power. Plaintiffs won the cases pursuant to TITLE 28 (APPENDIX: RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS: TITLE VII. JUDGMENT: Rule 55. Default). Plaintiffs and had no path other than through the duty of the Clerk of The Court’s Duty under Title 28 Rule 55 (b)(1) to award Summary Judgment, which was denied by the Clerk. Any Appeal through the Judiciary would be just moot as the void dismissals issued by Fogel and Ware since there is no Judicial Power in this case brought against the State and judiciary. Plaintiffs move again in this case to enforce collection and summary judgment on the first two cases Plaintiffs field. Naturally Statutes of Limitation do not apply to this case where the government is employing the courts to delay and deny justice. In the Santa Cruz Superior Court, Commissioners and Judges Plaintiffs successfully sued still insist on presiding over Mr. Boustred’s divorce case, refusing to allow that case to move forward now for five and a half years. These judges and commissioner have also refused to enforce lawfully Stipulated Agreements and Orders and have prevented Mr. Boustred from even refinancing his own home, forcing Mr. Boustred to borrow money on credit cards whom have now proceeded to charge Mr. Boustred 30% interest on balances. New companies Plaintiffs started have also now been destroyed as a consequence. While the judges and commissioner issued and upheld blatantly void and illegal orders, including criminal void orders kidnapping Mr. Boustred’s children, they went as far as to continuously sanction and fine Mr. Boustred in blatant violations of rules of court and the law and reflecting such baseless criminal behavior unbefitting of the bench. The net result of the completely out of control behavior of the Courts and government officials has been that instead of building the next generation Internet and education systems InfoTelesys had developed, Mr. Boustred has been forced into five and a half years of defending himself from criminal assaults made by the government, and close to five years attempting to get his kidnapped children back. The government has Made Mixed War against Mr. Boustred and his children and is doing the same to many citizens in this Nation. Mr. Boustred who has worked at the forefront of technology and lead the industry in many areas, undertook an extensive investigation of the nature and cause of the government Making Mixed War against himself and other citizens. Many of these findings are published on the Liberty For Life Association website at http://www.libertyforlife.com The underlying or root cause to the extraordinary corruption in the government in the United States can be traced to the fraud and crimes committed during the Woodrow Wilson Presidency in 1913 when private individuals and foreigners were granted the exclusive “franchise” of the U.S. dollar also referred to as “banksters” and or “Agents of the Rothschild’s” and “New World Order” herein. Principle of these foreigners who hijacked the dollar is the Rothschild family whose World Dominance plan was formally completed by Whitehouse on May 1, 1776 (May Day). Earlier assumption of Lincoln’s War debt by these banksters can also reveals their underlying Hegelian Dialectic meddling in that devastating war which to this day 90% of U.S. citizens have no idea what the so-called “Civil War” was fought over. Most citizens even believe Lincoln was honest. See http://www.libertyforlfie.com/constitution/politicians/dishonest_abe.htm C. VENUEVenue is appropriate in this court because the majority of the DEFENDANTS reside in this district, and a substantial amount of the acts and omissions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in this district. Venue is proper in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391, in that the subject matter of this action arose in this district, furthermore petitioners CLIVE FRANK BOUSTRED, RCB, WFB, Santa Cruz Cats and CopperCards are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district and petitioners INFOTELESYS, INC. and GET IT REAL, INC., Nevada citizens, fall within the general U.S. District Court jurisdiction. Intradistrict Assignment.This lawsuit should be assigned to the San Jose Division of this Court because a substantial part of the events or omissions which give rise to this lawsuit occurred in San Jose/Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties. D. JURISDICTIONThis court house has jurisdiction over this complaint because it arises under the laws of the United States. This action arises under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1988, 1961, 1962, 1964) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and 19 U.S.C. § 1961-68 and English Common Law and the First Amendment, Second Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Eleventh Amendment, the missing Thirteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and the alleged Sixteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and Article 1 thereof. Via Trial By Jury only this Court has jurisdiction of the federal claims under 28 U.S.C. Section 1331, 1332, 1343(3) 1343(4), 2201, and 2202. Pursuant to the 11th Amendment there is no Judicial Power over this claim and the matter can only be decided and tried and any stage of the process by Trial by Jury. Furthermore, Federal Court has jurisdiction over these matters pursuant to: (1) National interstate commerce has been destroyed and severely impacted for a number of national and international corporations as a consequence of direct and blatant Constitutional violations by California Courts and authorities against Petitioner with a consequence of destroying the following National and International Corporations: InfoTelesys, Inc. (Nevada); Get IT Real, Inc. (Nevada). (2) This matter involves national and international business contracts, in addition to Petitioner’s international marriage contract. Californian Courts have given up jurisdiction over these matters: (3) Remedies have been exhausted in the California Courts. (4) Californian courts up to the Californian Supreme Court repeatedly refuse to file motions or bring matters to trial, denying even the most rudimentary due process at law, even going as far as to sanction Petitioner Clive Boustred for simply seeking the most elementary rights under the law and due process. (5) The Santa Cruz Superior Court contractually gave up jurisdiction in this matter As Petitioner’s are filing this suit against the State of California and Counties in the State of California, it is impossible to believe that these Petitioners, who have been severely impacted by unlawful Constitutional violations by Californian Courts, would receive fair treatment in California Courts, particularly since Petitioners are suing the Californian Courts for outrageous Constitutional violations against Petitioners. It is in the interests of the Federal Courts and “We the People” of The United States of America to ensure that U.S. citizens and corporations receive fair treatment under the laws of the land and that State Courts conform to and do not violate the Constitution of the United States of America. E. AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS OR PREJUDICEPETITIONERS do solemnly sincerely and truly declare and allege and believe that Judges employed by parties who are DEFENDANTS or directly related to DEFENDANTS have reason for and are biased against PETITIONER. Pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment due to the fact that this suit is brought by Citizens of Nevada and Nevis (InfoTelesys, Inc. and Get IT Real, Inc.) against another State (California) and the United States of America, Judges have no power in this case an the case must be tried by jury where the jury determines both the law and fact. Additionally Pursuant to Due Process Clauses of the Constitution due to the fact that this suit is brought against colleagues and the employer of judges of the U.S. District Court, jurisdiction does not extend toward Judges of the Court and pursuant to the dictates of due process, all matters both regarding fact and law may only be decided by Jury. PLAINTIFFS declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the information above and herein is true and correct to the best of our knowledge.
_________________________________ Date:__________________ Clive Boustred AUTHORITIESU.S. Constitution, Eleventh Amendment: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” – Said power resides with the independent Jury. ANALYSIS OF THE 11TH AMENDMENT:What are the two powers through which the courts rule? · Judicial power · Jury power And note that Judicial power is questionable, however, Jury power may not be reexamined (7th Amendment). Also do not be deceived, the Jury has the power to judge both the law and the fact A classic example of the jury process in which there is absolutely zero judicial involvement from administrative, adjudicative or any decision making power what so ever is the Gran Jury process. There is no judge in a Grand Jury, the jury is made up of "we the people" and decides both fact and law. Grand Juries make up a critical component of the legal framework mandated by the Constitution as dictated in the Fifth Amendment "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury". The very construct of the Constitution, the essence of the formation of the United States of America, is founded on the principle of eliminating tyrannical government; the construct that the government can not do what they want; the principle that all stand equal before the law and that all parties to suits are entitled to impartial decision makers; etc. Consequentially, the establishment of the 11th Amendment is based upon the principle that the judiciary, which consists of a group of individuals whom are employed by the State, naturally has no authority to preside over a case brought against their employer, the State. Suits brought against the State can thus naturally only be adjudicated by Jury where the decision maker in the trial or in any matter leading up to the trial is no party to the suit and where the Jury in accordance with the construct of Trial By Jury, decides both the law and the fact. "The jury has the right to judge both the law and the facts" - Samuel Chase, 1804, Supreme Court Justice and signer of the Declaration of Independence. In a Trial By Jury the judiciary has no function. The judiciary has no power to dismiss a case or weigh the merits of a case that is brought before the court for a trial by jury. Those are functions absolutely and completely reserved for the jury. Clearly the judiciary has no authority to make any decisions in a Trial by Jury, otherwise, it is no longer a Trial By Jury, it becomes a Trial by Judge. If, for example, a judge orders that certain evidence be not presented to a jury, then that judge holds the power to influence the outcome of the trial and it is a trial by judge and not by jury. One of the key reasons the courts are so utterly corrupt in the United States is because judges rush in and take control of trials by jury, thereby exceeding their jurisdiction and according to the law, those judges commit treason. That is they pervert the very construct of law and order and governance in the nation. Judges so readily commit treason in our courts because they know the appeal process offered to those the commit treason against is made up of appellate courts consisting entirely of judges employed by the State. In other words, judges have completely destroyed the Trial By Jury process within U.S. courts, committing high treason of the very worst kind. Rampant abuse of process and the destruction of the Constitutionally mandated law and order within the nation has resulted. The Judiciary and Executive Office have now become so completely out of control that they themselves now make law, ignoring Article 1, Section. 8 of the Constitution which dictates that "The Congress shall have Power.... To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such district". The tricameral construct of government in the United States explicitly limits lawmaking power to Congress. The Executive and Judicial branch of government is explicitly prohibited from making law. (Note that Common Law dictates that if a law cannot be understood/interpreted by the common man, then it is not law. i.e. there is no judicial construct to interpreting law - if the common person cannot understand the law then it must be sent back to Congress as void, forcing Congress to rewrite the law so that the common man can understand it. Note also that the "Code" is not law, it is code, like a "code of ethics" see LAW and Understanding Law in the U.S.) Clearly the judiciary has no decision making authority in suits brought against their colleagues. Commentary regarding Supreme Court Analysis of the 11th Amendment: Many courts including the Supreme Court have made a number of contradictory and clearly blatantly void rulings in regard to the 11th Amendment. Astonishingly, the courts have read into the 11th not only concepts that are absolutely not there, but concepts that scream in the opposite direction to the construct of the Constitution. In particular, the concept of "sovereign immunity of government" and the elimination of accountability of the State. Great error has crept into many judicial decisions in regard to the idea of Sovereign immunity, which is not mentioned once in any way or in any part of the Constitution. Such a concept flies in the opposite direction of the principles and purposes upon which the government of the U.S. was established. There is absolutely no principle of Sovereign immunity under the Constitution, which goes to great lengths to ensure equality and responsibility under the law and is the exact opposite of any suggestion of a sovereign class or of any immunity. To the contrary, government entities and employees, if anyone, are to be held to a higher standard when it comes to responsibility under the law, they are utterly accountable – this after all was the purpose of establishing the U.S. and the underlying construct of the Constitution. Immunity is mentioned only twice in the Constitution: Article IV, Section. 2. "The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States." thus implying absolute equality of all citizens whether or not they work for the State or not. And in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." which further enforces the construct of equality. There is categorically and absolutely zero implication or statement within the 11th Amendment that says or implies that a State cannot be sued or has 'sovereign immunity', it simply is not there. All the 11th says is that judges have no power (Judicial power). What other decision making power remains? Naturally the other cornerstone of the judicial system: Jury power. There are two ways to decide a case in a Court: Either by Jury or by Judge. The very construct of Trial by Jury was given to our nation so that the very construct of Judicial corruption could be overcome. The very reason we give the Jury the power to decide both the law and the fact is because we know, as the founding fathers knew, that the government and in particular the judiciary, would become corrupt. And how they have! Take a look at what "Judicial Power" has attempted to infer as to their absurd interpretation of the 11th Amendment: - the judiciary goes as absurdly far as to suggest that a State cannot be sued, which is a classic example of the Judiciary attempting to make law because no where does the 11th Amendment or any part of the Constitution say or infer such; - the Judiciary has even tried to make new law saying that “they the government” is Sovereign, that “they the government” can Lord it over “we the people” as “Kings and Queens” who have been put on the throne by God Himself (thereby taking on the very persona of King George who was thrown out by the American Revolution); - And that they the government, like the King and Queen, can do no wrong because, after all, God put them on the nations throne, and God can do no wrong. This is the origins of sovereign immunity under English Common Law which is subordinate to and overruled by our Constitution. The Judiciary's interpretation of the 11th is utterly and categorically and pathetically absurd! The U.S.A. was founded so as to bring accountability to government, there is no king or queen in the U.S., all stand equal before the law. As for the Kings and Queens of England’s idea that because the Bible states that God puts authorities on the throne (Romans 13:1 “for there is no authority except that which God has established”), that this some how grants the King or Queen sovereign immunity, it too, is also utterly absurd and illogical. Since such a foolish analysis ignores the fact that und such construct, it implies that God also put people like Hitler or Bush on the ‘throne’. Clearly, such a positioning is not one to be respected, but rather that perhaps God’s reasoning for such, is more likely to chastise us to stand up against such tyrants, to speak out for the common man, and to stand up for justice and to hold tyrannical rulers accountable. The very behavior of Judicial power within the U.S. illustrates the exact purpose of the 11th which is to eliminate Judicial power in suits where judges are parties to the suit. In any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. The Judiciary is employed by the entity against which the suit is brought and therefore obviously has no authority to preside over such a suit as they have good reason for inherent bias. The interesting elements regarding this very case, is that the case is about extreme governmental abuse and exactly the protections guaranteed by the Constitution and that embedded in the 11th Amendment. Without any cause the government literally shot at Clive and his children, falsely arrested and threw Clive in jail, kidnapped his children, then maliciously and outrageously prosecuted Clive to cover up. The government went as far as to order Clive to not communicate with his children and then handed the children to a man who is ordered to have no contact with Clive’s children, a man who in his own words admits to having serious problems with drugs, sex and pornography. You don’t get much worse criminal activity. You can’t get much lower integrity or worse abuse. The judicial abuses employed in the cover-up in this situation are astounding and rampant, shocking the conscience, and are now deeply embedded in this very case. What is even more astonishing is that Judge Jeremy Fogel who was initially assigned as the judge to the first Federal suit filed by the Plaintiffs, and who became a defendant in that case because of blatant violations at law against Plaintiffs, himself wrote an article entitled 'Justice denied is a national problem’ for the San Jose Mercury’s series on “Tainted Trial, Stolen Justice”. In the article Mr. Fogel states: “Vigorous enforcement of ethical standards for prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges is essential” he goes on to state “Integrity and professional competence are minimum requirements for all of us who do the public's work”. Good advice, however, Mr. Fogel himself acted on the opposite side of his own advice and critique. There are 2 means to trial: 1 by judge (Judicial power) and 2 by jury (Jury power). Recognize that facts determined by Judicial power can be questioned, however, facts determined by Jury power may not be re-examined (7t Amendment – “and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”). As a further note in exposing the corruption of our courts: No new law is made through judicial rulings. The use of “Judicial Precedence” or “Case Law” by our Courts is totally misplaced. Only the Legislature has any authority to make law. The judiciary has absolutely no authority or power to make law. The underlying Common-Law construct is that no law is law unless the common person can understand it – this is Common-Law (which is not a Code based system). Thus, there is no function for the ‘interpretation of the law’. If a law is ambiguous or difficult to understand, then under Common-Law, it is therefore not law. The one and only function of the judiciary in the area of confusion as to interpretation of a law, is that if a law is not clearly definable and understood by the common man, then the judiciary’s only function is to send the law back to the Legislature to make it clear so that the common person can understand it. In trials by jury, the judiciary has no function, as is the case in Grand Juries. All that is required to bring a matter to trial by jury is a claim on information OR belief by a plaintiff that a wrong has been committed by DEFENDANTS to which relief might be entitled. This is a very low bar which has more than been met by Plaintiffs in this case. This matter must proceed to Trial by Jury. A judge not only has no authority to try matters of fact or law in this case due to the Trial by Jury demand, but also due to the protection from Judicial power as clearly established by the 11th Amendment. F. SUFFICIENCY OF CLAIM"By the plain terms of section 1983, two - and only two - allegations are required in order to state a cause of action under that statute. First, the plaintiff must allege that some person has deprived him of a federal right. Second, he must allege that the person who has deprived him of that right acted under color of state or territorial law." - Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635 (1980) All that is required to bring a case to trial in Federal Court is a showing that the pleader is entitled to relief: Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the sufficiency of the complaint is tested with regard to the applicable standard in FRCP 8(a), which requires that a pleading setting forth a claim for relief contain a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. A complaint which does not recount all relevant facts or recite the law should not necessarily be dismissed. La Salvia v. United Dairymen, 804 F.2d 1113, 1116 (9th Cir. 1986) In light of the fact that FRCP 8(a)(2) merely requires a short and plain statement of the claim, rather than specific facts detailing every allegation, mere vagueness or lack of detail is not a ground for a motion to dismiss. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957). FRCP 12(b)(6) does not countenance dismissals based merely on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989), nor is the failure to plead facts showing the plaintiff's theory of liability grounds for dismissal since the defendant can serve interrogatories requiring the plaintiff to particularize the theory of liability. In answering this question, the Court must assume that the plaintiff's allegations are true, including all facts alleged on information and belief, and must draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Smith v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1213, 1217 (9th Cir. 1996) Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir. 1987). Even if the face of the pleadings suggests that the chance of recovery is remote, the Court must allow the plaintiff to develop the case at this stage of the proceedings. United States v. City of Redwood, 640 F.2d 963, 966 (9th Cir. 1981) The question presented by a motion to dismiss is not whether the plaintiff will prevail in the action, but whether the plaintiff is entitled to offer evidence in support of the claim. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974). If a plaintiff colorably states facts which, if proven, would entitle her to relief, a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim should not be granted. Dairies v. Kraft Foods, 232 F.3d 979, 994 (9th Cir. 2000) Over four and a half years of malicious prosecution including seven SLAP cases initiated by DEFENDANTS, all which were either initiated by an attempted murder or by anticompetitive and or other crimes committed by DEFENDANTS, gives rise to literally hundreds of claims upon which relief can be granted in this case. For each Defendant Plaintiffs have shown that there is a least one claim upon which relief can be granted. NO STATUTES OF LIMITATIONSStatutes of limitations do not apply in this case due to the fact that DEFENDANTS conspired to maliciously prosecute PLAINTIFFS for the express purpose of covering up crimes committed by DEFENDANTS. DEFENDANTS have consistently and repeatedly denied PLAINTIFFS due process, eliminating any Statute of Limitation. DEFENDANTS acted under the color of law and committed fraud thereby eliminating any statutes of limitation in this case. Statutes of Limitation only start ticking once PLAINTIFFS have been afforded their right to a trial by jury. See extensive AUTHORITIES firmly establishing there are no Statutes of Limitation in this case in the “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” section, NO JUDICIAL POWER IN THIS CASE11th Amendment: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” A judge has no power to dismiss InfoTelesys, Inc. and Get IT Real, Inc. from this suit. In fact in accordance with the 11th Amendment there is no judicial power in this suit. Any order by a judge in this case is void and of no force and effect. Jeremy Fogel was clearly and blatantly in excess of jurisdiction when he attempted to dismiss these parties from an earlier suit and he violated Plaintiffs 11th Amendment rights. This matter must proceed immediately to Trial By Jury. See extensive AUTHORITIES firmly establishing there are no Judicial Power in this case in the “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” section. In addition to the extensive argument relating to this topic in section “E. AFFIDAVIT OF BIAS OR PREJUDICE”. PRO SE LITIGANTS ENTITLED TO WIDE LATITUDE“Pro Se (Without a Lawyer, representing self) pleadings are to be considered without technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers.” - HAINES V. KERNER, 92 S.Ct. 594; JENKINS V. MCKEITHEN, 395 US 411, 421 (1969); PICKING V. PENNA. RWY. CO. 151 F.2d 240; PUCKETT V. COX, 456 F.2d 233. “The pleading of one who pleads pro se for the protection of civil rights should be liberally construed” - BLOOD V. MARGIS, 322 F.2d 1086 (1971) There are decisions in virtually every federal circuits that generously proclaim that pro per petitions should be construed liberally and that pro per petitioners should be held to less stringent standards than lawyers. See, e.g., Price v. Johnston (1948) 334 U.S. 266, 292; Chase v. Crips (10th Cir. 1975) 523 F.2d 595, 597; Curtis v. Illinois (7th Cir. 1975) 512 F2d 717; Ham v. North Carolina (4th Cir. 1973) 471 F.2d 406, 407; Hairston v. Alabama (5th Cir. 1972) 465 F.2d 675, 678 n5; Turrell v. Perini (6th Cir. 1969) 414 F.2d 1231, 1233; Montgomery v. Brierly (3rd Cir. 1969) 414 F.2d 552; Pembrook v. Wilson, (9th Cir. 1966) 370 F.2d 37, 40; Whittaker v. Overholster (D.C. Cir. 1962) 299 F.2d 447, 448. See also Haines v. Kerner (1972) 404 U.S. 519. This right is also protected under the First Amendment Free Speech Clause. And within those rights, the pro se litigant's court submissions are to be construed liberally and held to less stringent standards than submissions of lawyers. If the court can reasonably read the submissions, it should do so despite failure to cite proper legal authority, confusion of legal theories, poor syntax and sentence construction, or litigant's unfamiliarity with rule requirements. Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 102 S.Ct. 700, 70 L.Ed.2d 551 (1982); Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972); McDowell v. Delaware State Police, 88 F.3d 188, 189 (3rd Cir. 1996); United States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 42 (3rd Cir. 1992)(holding pro se petition cannot be held to same standard as pleadings drafted by attorneys); Then v. I.N.S., 58 F.Supp.2d 422, 429 (D.N.J. 1999). The courts provide pro se parties wide latitude when construing their pleadings and papers. When interpreting pro se papers, the Court should use common sense to determine what relief the party desires. S.E.C. v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560, 1582 (11th Cir. 1992). See also, United States v. Miller, 197 F.3d 644, 648 (3rd Cir. 1999) (Court has special obligation to construe pro se litigants' pleadings liberally); Poling v. K.Hovnanian Enterprises, 99 F.Supp.2d 502, 506-07 (D.N.J. 2000). Defendant has the right to submit pro se briefs on appeal, even though they may be inartfully drawn but the court can reasonably read and understand them. See, Vega v. Johnson, 149 F.3d 354 (5th Cir. 1998). Courts will go to particular pains to protect pro se litigants against consequences of technical errors if injustice would otherwise result. U.S. v. Sanchez, 88 F.3d 1243 (D.C.Cir. 1996). See also extensive AUTHORITIES firmly establishing Pro Se, In Propria Persona and Sui Juris equal rights to due process in this case in the “K. COMMON AUTHORITIES” section. G. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYOn March 10, 2003, without probable cause Santa Cruz Sheriffs set ambush, pursued Plaintiffs running up to Plaintiffs vehicle in front of Plaintiffs garage on private property and attempted from point blank range of five to seven feet to blow Plaintiff Clive Frank Boustred’s head off in front of his children RCB and WFB. WFB aged three at the time was in the direct line of fire behind his father, RCB aged seven was two feet off the line of fire. After the assassination attempt failed, the government engaged in a series of outrageous malicious prosecutions against Plaintiff Clive Frank Boustred. Acting under the color of law, filing a barrage of malicious and false charges against, Clive including two false felonies and nine false misdemeanors, DEFENDANTS have sought to drive Petitioners into ruin. Clive has been falsely arrested on multiple occasions and held for five months without even any right to bail. Clive was given patently sham trials where the jury was rigged and he was not allowed to put any evidence proving his innocence before the jury and even had his testimony struck from the record, yet the government was allowed to put hearsay, double hearsay and know lies before the jury along with totally misleading information. One of the most despicable and outrageous acts by the government against Clive following the assassination attempt, was to kidnap his children RCB and WFB. The government’s gunman literally violently chased WFB after shooting at the children, WFB wet his pants in fear, both boys were reduced to a zombie like state of shock. The government then handed the children to a man who was ordered to have no contact with the children, a man who in his own words admitted to having serious problems with drugs, pornography and sex. The government ordered that Clive not communicate with his children for three years. The boys lived with their dad before the government tried to kill their dad in front of them. The government went as far as to repeatedly deny the boys not only access to their father but also access to their grandparents. The government completely ignored and repeatedly covered up blatant & irrefutable crimes committed against Clive & his children Neither Clive nor his children have had any justice or any fair hearing in three and a half years. The California and U.S. District Courts have maintained that the government’s false charge that Clive drove at around forty miles per hour down his private road justified the government from shooting at Clive and his children, ordering that Clive not communicate with his children for three years, arresting and sentencing Clive to six months in jail, filing Clive’s name and DNA in the California Central Felons Index and also filing Clive’s name in California’s Central Child Abuse Index. Irrefutable proof showed that Clive drove a slow 27 miles per hour down his private road where the Sheriffs without warrant or any probable cause, laid in ambush, unlawfully chased and then attempted to assassinate Clive in front of his children. Clive Frank Boustred was the Founder, President, Chairman, CEO and Key Man of InfoTelesys, Inc. that was well underway in building a next generation internet which amongst other exciting projects was building a global education system that literally had significant and real potential to eliminate world hunger – see the Get IT Ed project on the www.InfoTelsys.com site. The company was in the process of developing and deploying it’s IT-I2 satellite network capable of delivering one gigabit connections anywhere in the world. A joint education project in Afghanistan between InfoTelesys, World Vision, World Bank and numerous Afghan organizations was destroyed as a consequence of actions by DEFENDANTS. InfoTelesys, Inc. was even approached to build an education system for China’s largest education facility and as a direct consequence to ongoing malicious prosecution InfoTelesys could also not take up that opportunity. InfoTelesys had amongst their team some of the worlds top banking systems experts and was in the process of building a competitor to the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. History has show that U.S. Presidents who challenged the legality of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank to take the peoples money and charge us interest on it, were either assassinated or shot at. H. PREAMBLE - GOVERNMENT OUT OF CONTROL IN THE CONTROL OF FOREIGNERSThis government fights against the righteous, convicting the innocent and not only acquitting the guilty but literally supporting and litigating for the guilty! This government levies War against we the people, adhering to our Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. Surely our government is nothing less than a sham engaged in criminal racketeering and treason, a bunch of filthy criminals. No doubt, there are some in our government who have integrity, however, what are they doing about the severe and outrageous criminal nature of those who are clearly committing the most heinous crimes in the name of our government and “We the People”. Extensive study of the problem by Plaintiff Clive Boustred, employing similar analytical techniques he used to architect technological leading strategies, lays out the reasons and cause of government corruption. Convincing evidence shows an ongoing conspiracy associated with the owners of the Federal Reserve Bank, who for more than a century, have conspired to obtain world dominance and a "Novus Ordo Seclorum," or "A New Order of the Ages" more commonly known as the “New World Order” by employing Hegelian Dialectic processes causing conflict so as to take advantage of people suffering hardships in said conflict. (See NOTE) Central elements to this New World Order’s strategy is the control of a Nations money supply (where they literally create money out of nothing enabling their purchase of almost anything); control of government agencies and politicians, especially judges; implementation of a police state; dominating and censoring media; control of education; and the implementation of communism / socialism including claiming head of family status and the kidnap of children from their opponents & the implementation of a Police State that incarcerates millions employing “pre-crime prosecution” where the innocent are prosecuted and incarcerated based on alleged potential damage (Corpus delicti). The New World Order conspiracy benefits a very small number of individuals, placing the masses, including every person who is a listed Defendant in this case, in abject servitude. Judges, Sheriffs, Clerks and District Attorneys also have to pay six to ten months of their salary to the New World Order bankers. To put in perspective the oppressive strategy of the New World Order conspiracy, consider 1994. In 1994 the economy was booming from what has proven to be the world’s larges and most significant industrial revolution ever, the information era. Greenspan, the Chairman of the major New World Orders bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, claimed ‘that the Internet bubble was going to burst’. The irrational exuberance of Greenspan’s claims have been proven completely wrong. The Internet bubble was only the froth on the surface of an enormous and exciting industry that is bringing huge benefits and profit to mankind. Internet has survived and continues its extraordinary growth. 1994 is interesting from other perspectives too. The attempt by the Federal Reserve Bank to Crash the Internet boom by raising interest rates at an incredible rate failed (See Graph Below), this followed a failed attempt by the FBI to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993[1]. However at the time, the Berlin Wall had come down, the cold war was over and money was pouring into the U.S. to fund the Internet revolution, the future was bright and the economy was booming, even the government had a surplus. The world was not only welcoming peace we were welcoming the new prosperity Internet brought.
Very few of the worlds population own computers, Internet is still in its infancy. The New World Order oligarchy simply do not want the average man to advance and benefit, they want to dominate and control mankind. Consequentially, when their efforts to crash the markets in 1994 failed they implemented renewed efforts in 1999 when Greenspan literally stepped out of the Federal Reserve Bank’s domain into the SEC’s domain and concertedly worked to scare investors with his “irrational exuberance” speeches so as to crash the marked. With the Millennium celebrations it looked like the world would brush off the Fed’s crashing the market in 1999, so in 2001, Bush, Cheny and crew then stepped in to finish off what the FBI failed to do in 1993, blowing up the World Trade Center and flying a missile into the Pentagon, what PNAT referred to as a “New Pearl Harbor” event. Take note of Greenspan’s recent allegations regarding the real estate market ‘bubble’ – No doubt, these banksters are snapping up real estate across the U.S. after they also caused that crash. However, they don’t have to buy real estate to own it, by simply lending money they ‘create out of nothing’, the Federal Reserve Bank owners effectively own everyone’s homes anyway. Where does the money come from? The Federal Reserve Bank owners invent it out of thin air then lend it to us in exchange for real assets! What a steal! No wonder these banksters shoot any President or anyone who challenges them. Plaintiffs Association With These Events: Plaintiffs Clive Boustred and InfoTelesys, Inc. were in the process of deploying a next generation internet called IT-I2™ capable of delivering one gigabit connections anywhere in the world. IT-I2™ also incorporated next generation banking that would compete with the New World Orders usurious and corrupt banking systems and it delivered next generation media that would compete with the New World Orders control of current media (InfoTelesys, the Media Channel for the New Millennium™), in addition to next generation education that would significantly improve education for billions of people around the world. Of particular note is that the InfoTelesys media and education systems were based on “pull” and not “push” media, that is, the consumer could choose content instead of an oligarchy dictating what is broadcast on TV or radio or taught in schools. The President of the United States and many other senior officials, who are clearly a part of the New World Order conspiracy, were fully aware of InfoTelesys and the capabilities of IT-I2™. The Russian government had provided InfoTelesys with one hundred launch vehicles for the IT-I2™ network in addition to Space Station Mir. The White House was strangely silent regarding proposals InfoTelesys, Inc. made (See the included Liberty For Life Dot.Bomb Conspiracy News DVD). What is important to not loose sight of is the exciting era in which we are blessed to live. We are all witnessing the cusp of a new renaissance. Just as the printing press destroyed oligarchic control of ‘we the people’ when Martin Luther translated the Bible into languages ordinary people could understand, computers and digital media and networks are translating what in the past was kept secret and used to dominate and control people. Documentaries, websites and blogs are popping up all overt he place revealing the explicit involvement of our government in the 9/11 False Flag events and all the other crimes they are committing against us. Technology is ushering in new knowledge and dynamic education that no oligarchy can control. Knowledge will set us free, the future is bright. By awarding Plaintiffs the summary judgments they have been entitled to and damages they are entitled to in this suit, all mankind will benefit significantly from what InfoTelesys still needs to deploy. These benefits extend also to the DEFENDANTS in this case and even the members of the New World Order oligarchy. There are very few people in the world who know how to build massively scalar networks capable of supporting billions of users. There are not many people in the world who have a firm understanding of problems that face humanity and more importantly who have significant real solutions to address many of the more difficult problems. And there are very few people who are able to bring solutions to the extraordinary serious problems facing all of us as a consequence of the Rothschild New World Order conspiracy. Having all skill sets in all three of these domains is extremely unusual. Having the courage to do what Clive is doing is however something only the Lord can provide. Every individual involved in this case aught to be working to help make things easier for Clive Boustred and his sons Richard and William and not just the opposite. The Sheriffs Lieutenant, Hemmingway, who most probably developed the strategy to maliciously prosecute Clive Boustred and who on the day the Sheriffs Shooting Instructor shot at Clive in front of Richard and William, kidnapped the boys, already died of an aneurism. The Judge, Art Danner, who maliciously prosecuted Clive Boustred giving him an absurdly sham trial and sent him to jail for six months without any right to bail for the alleged ‘crime’ of Clive driving at around 27mph down his private road, has already died from a heart attack. The lawyer, Vicki Parry, who repeatedly incited Clive’s ex, Anamaria, to renege on settlement agreements and to make false 911 calls, has landed up in the ICU as her liver fails. These are but three examples illustrating what goes around comes around - karma. Life is short, before we know it, we will all be accounting for what we did with our lives. Plaintiffs hope DEFENDANTS will see the errors of their ways and join with Plaintiffs to fulfill the InfoTelesys mission: “To make the world a better place, showing respect for all creation, while operating with complete integrity, for it is in God we trust.” SETTING THE STAGE OF OPPRESSION IN THE UNITED STATESPlaintiffs are effectively oppressed by agents of the New World Order / Rothschild’s and other foreign interests who have ceased control of the U.S. dollar and employed their control of the currency to instigate and fund wars, to crash the markets and to purchase controlling interests in media, industry and government so as to implement a socialist tyrannical dictatorship in the U.S. that is vastly worse than what King George imposed on the American Colony before the Revolution. These agents of the Rothschild’s have placed themselves as socialist sovereigns who lord it over we the people, claiming more sovereign privileges than even King George claimed. As is proven by Plaintiffs first two cases, these so-called officers of the law and courts, claim that they can attempt to murder, assault, kidnap and steal from citizens with complete impunity, with ‘sovereign immunity’. The saddest aspect of these agents of the Rothschild’s is that their servitude to the New World Order oligarchy enslaves themselves and their children along with future generations around the world. Most of these Agents of the Rothschild’s also have to work six months of the year to pay interest these banksters demand on our own money. They too are likely to end up in one of the banksters jails, prisons or concentration camps if vaccines or cancer inducing substances propagated secretly by these banksters do not get them first, or this will be the fate of their children & future generations. The manner in which Agents of the Rothschild’s are treated, is perhaps most clearly demonstrated in how the U.S. Armed Forces are treated. Our soldiers are considered cannon fodder. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, with far more than a million U.S. Gulf War veterans already disabled[2] (mostly from exposure to Nuclear Waste in the form of dirty bomb armor piercing rounds the U.S. manufactures and deploys, and from violent concoctions of vaccines designed as components of biological warfare). Also according to the Department of Veterans Affairs, more than 73,000 U.S. Gulf War troops are already dead[3]. The agents of the Rothschild’s are often the first to be eliminated. When disabled they are usually left to rot. Conservative estimates put the number of Iraqi’s murdered by the illegal U.S. invasion of their nation at over one million, with the total number of dead children and adults estimated at around two and a half million when one also adds the number of civilians who died from the U.S. imposed sanctions. The term this sect of Jewish Zionist banksters use to refer to everyone but themselves is “Goyim” or “cattle” i.e. we are to be used, sold and slaughtered at will – this predominantly Jewish sect must not be confused with regular Jews, this band of insane banksters worship Lucifer. Their ‘secret’ god is JAOBULON. "JAO" is the Greek word for Jehovah. "BUL" is the name for Baal. "ON" was the name used in ancient Egyptian religion to call upon their god, Osiris. You can find their owl god of Molock before whom they literally sacrifice people, along with and their ‘all seeing eye’ on their dollar bills and in other locations such as Bohemian Grove about 75 miles North of San Francisco. Their satanic rituals have been videotaped and books have been written by many people who have uncovered these insane practices. Members of their sect are often recruited from the Masons which maintain strict isolation and ‘secrets’ between different levels of Masonry so as to keep lower levels subservient and ignorant of ‘higher’ levels ‘knowledge’. Most Masons have no idea that they to do not come close to meeting the ‘purity’ of Jewish bloodline necessary to avoid being classified as Goyim. Strict hierarchical organizational structures keep these individuals in the dark. Use the Internet to search “Yale Bones Club” of “Bohemian Grove” or “Goyim” or “Child sacrifice” – if you can stomach carefully analyzing the results, your ignorance regarding these matters should quickly dissolve. The sheer foolishness and stupidity of our government officials who are actively imposing this foreign tyranny on ‘we the people’ is astonishing. Many, if not most of these officials, have absolutely no idea for whom and what they are working. Most don’t even know that the Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank that takes our dollars for nothing and lends them back to us plus interest. When explaining to these agents the fact that the Federal Reserve Bank takes the U.S. dollar for printing costs or free if digital, and they turn around and lend it back to us at thousands, millions, billions and even trillions more inflated value, many of these agents of the Rothschild’s show a complete lack of comprehension of this extreme crime. They actually often think that the person showing them that their pocket is being picked is foolish! You will also hopefully recognize that computer technology has blown the lid on this insane group of criminals who have been mastering our world and murdering our Presidents who were brave enough to challenge them[4]. When the great U.S. Industrialist Henry Ford said "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning" surely he was saying it with tongue in cheek, because it certainly is not well enough. If people cannot understand that foreign interests own our dollar and use that ability to manufacture trillions of dollars for themselves out of thin air, thus giving themselves the ability to purchase anything they want, including complete control of all mainstream media, the military industrial complex, most major corporations, government officials (especially politicians and judges), then perhaps the people can understand some of the raw statistics: U.S.A. Worlds Worst Prison State"In 2004, nearly 7 million people were on probation, in jail or prison, or on parole at yearend 2004 -- 3.2% of all U.S. adult residents or 1 in every 31 adults." - U.S. Department of Justice[5].
However one looks at it, whether total numbers or percentage of population, shown below, the United States of America is the Worlds Worst Prison State by orders of magnitude:
These raw statistics alone should shut down the Courts throughout the U.S. Judges, lawyers and District Attorneys practicing criminal law in the U.S. aught to be bared from the bar for failing to uphold the law and racketeering through their support of the Prison Industrial Complex. The sheer shame and disgrace of persons practicing law in this disgraceful field is unconscionable. The reason for this crime is simple:
Prisons are profitable, judges, lawyers, District Attorneys and police
are feeding off the lives of their victims they throw into prison for
personal profit. The same way Hitler and his Gestapo did it. The methods Cops, Judges, Lawyers, District Attorneys and Lawyers employ to commit their crimes are simple enough. Firstly the core English Common Law construct of “innocent until proven guilty” has been completely abandoned and replaced with “guilty without any right to prove innocence” (general practice and codified in the Patriot Act), and the mandatory three elements necessary to convict someone of a crime have been abandoned. MENS REA - willful intent, actus reus - act or crime, CORPUS DELICTI - body of the crime, the actual damage, have all but been ignored. Instead, the majority of government prosecutions are for “pre-crime” charges in which there is no Corpus Delecti, no Mens Rea and no Acuts Rea and no real party of interest filing any Verified Criminal Complaint. Prosecutors manufacture charges and put their name at the end of the complaint in complete and arrogant violation of the law. The government then usually proceeds to blackmail their victim with a plea-bargain. In the fraud and black-mail of a plea-bargain, the government ‘on the side’ offers to drop some false charges and the length of the sentences their victim faces if the victim agrees to admit guilt or “no contest” for the remainder of the charges. Lawyers encourage their clients to accept the charges, telling their clients that they will be convicted if they take the matter to trial, no matte how false or absurd the charges are. And they lawyers are right! That’s because the judges simply prevent any evidence proving a persons innocence from coming before the jury while they rig the juries and impose “Judicial Law” in the form of “Case Law” which is no law at all! In the false charges the government filed against Mr. Boustred after their attempt to murder him on March 10, 2003 failed, the judges went as far as to literally strike Mr. Boustred’s favorable testimony that proved his innocence and allowed the prosecution to submit hearsay, double hearsay and known lies before the jury. They even ordered Mr. Boustred out of the court room and the Jury out of the court room when Mr. Boustred raised any legal or factual issues in his defense! (See Exhibits & Opening Briefs in the Placer case 72-002045 and Santa Cruz Case F08656 - [7]) Police arrest their victims on hearsay and flat out lies, throw them in jail then demand exorbitant bail which goes straight into the Sheriff’s bank account, without baring any interest to the victim, but certainly baring interest to the Sheriff. The police usually steal the victim’s vehicle and then demand ransom in the form of outrageous “towing and storage charges”. If the victim does not pay the ransom for their vehicle within 30 days the sheriffs sell the stolen vehicle for a fraction of it’s value to cover their ransom. When a victim of the government has been arrested and severely punished before any trial, Judges and lawyers trick the victims into entering “pleas” which the judges try to convince themselves is an “acceptance of prosecution” and washing of the crimes the government committed against their victim. Lawyers do nothing to advise their clients of their Constitutional and English Common Law rights, going along with the ‘system’ so that all the insiders can personally profit. The crimes committed by officers of the law are vastly more criminal than 90% of the people they prosecute. The San Jose Mercury New’s Tainted Trials Stolen Justice series in which highly respected legal professionals mostly from universities around the Nation analyzed cases under appeal “The review established that in 261 of the appellate cases reviewed -- more than one in every three of the total -- the criminal trial had been marred by questionable conduct that worked against the defendant. In only about one in 20 cases did the defendant win meaningful relief -- either a new trial or a significantly reduced sentence -- from higher courts. The problems occurred at every phase of a trial, and in every part of the system.” The report goes on to state: • Prosecutors. In nearly 100 cases, the prosecution engaged in questionable conduct that bolstered its effort to win convictions, the examination revealed. Some Santa Clara County prosecutors withheld evidence that could have helped DEFENDANTS, some defied judge's orders and some misled juries during closing arguments. But they did not act in a vacuum. In an adversary system in which defense attorneys and judges are responsible for guarding against prosecutors' excesses, the newspaper study found, those checks on the system too often fall short. • Defense attorneys. In 100 cases, defense attorneys acted in ways that harmed their clients. In nearly 50 cases, the attorneys failed to take the most basic of measures, from properly investigating their case to presenting the evidence they gathered. Defense attorneys failed in dozens more cases to object as prosecutors or judges engaged in questionable conduct, in effect excusing the mistakes. • Trial judges. In more than 150 cases, judges made missteps or questionable rulings that favored the prosecution. Violating legal precedents, trial judges allowed evidence that unfairly tainted DEFENDANTS and prohibited evidence that might have supported their defense. Repeatedly, judges failed to properly instruct jurors on legal principles, instead offering direction that made a guilty verdict more likely. • The appellate court. The 6th District Court of Appeal, the primary court of review for Santa Clara County cases, upheld verdicts in more than 100 cases even as it acknowledged errors had occurred. The appellate court simply concluded those errors made no difference in the outcome of the case. Sometimes those conclusions were appropriate, but a review of the appellate record and consultations with experts established that in more than 50 cases the court misstated facts, twisted logic and devised questionable rationales to dismiss the error. In nearly all the cases, the 6th District designates its opinions as ``not to be published'' -- a distinction that means they are not to be cited as legal authority in subsequent cases, and thus have little relevance beyond the parties to a case. The Mercury News found that higher courts are extremely unlikely to review unpublished opinions, making the 6th District the final word on most criminal trials in Santa Clara County. The unpublished designation also has served to shield the cases from outside review. Past academic and journalistic studies of criminal justice, here and elsewhere, have examined published opinions, even though they represent a tiny proportion of court decisions. The Mercury News review is unprecedented in its comprehensive analysis of criminal decisions, published and unpublished alike. State court statistics show the 6th District over time has published a smaller portion of its criminal cases -- 2 percent -- than any other appellate district in the state. The statewide average is 4 percent. Taken together, the Mercury News findings offer a picture of a system that often turns on its head the presumption that DEFENDANTS are innocent until proven guilty. Prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges and appellate justices often act in ways that cause DEFENDANTS' rights to be violated. The newspaper study points to a ``skewed system that disproportionately bends over backward to help the DA win,'' said Bennett Gershman, a former prosecutor and professor of criminal law at Pace University School of Law who has written on prosecutorial and judicial ethics. ``Admitting and excluding evidence unevenhandedly and overlooking serious errors is not a pretty state of affairs if one is concerned about fair trials. Nor if one is concerned about the appearance of justice.'' “Having had seven absurdly false cases filed against me after the Santa Cruz Sheriffs Shooing Instructor shot at me in front of my children, and having been put through two utterly sham trials, purported to be trials by jury, and having spent years and around one hundred and fifty thousand dollars on legal fees, I can honestly state, without hesitation, that the Judicial System in California and the United States of America is run by nothing less than a bunch of filthy criminals.” – Clive Boustred Such a sweeping statement is based on the simple fact that anyone working in the system cannot be unaware of the rampant corruption and the complete lack of fairness of the courts. Any person working in the system is thus consequentially guilty of misprision of felony pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4 “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.” amongst many other crimes.” Our District Attorney’s act as modern day Judas’, vigorously and falsely prosecuting people they know full well are innocent, so as to profit their own personal career. Ass. District Attorneys such as Santa Cruz’s Stephen Drottar, and his former boss Art Danner, surely are the lowest ebb of society, of moral character well below any of the criminals they prosecute. The San Jose Mercury News lists many other examples of District Attorneys who under the color of law prosecute people they know full well are innocent. When Santa Cruz’s former DA, Art Danner was caught red handed in crimes, all he did was resign without any consequence, and then he was appointed a Judge by Governor Wilson. Despite the Judicial Nominations Committee rating Art Danner as “Not Qualified” to be a judge, he was appointed to the bench. Only 2 out of 678 or so judicial nominees by Governor Wilson were ever rated as Not Qualified. Despite not qualifying, Art Danner went on to preside over a trial where the sheriffs had literally attempted to blow Mr. Boustred’s head off in front of his children. Danner acted criminally in the trial, with complete and utter disregard for the law and justice. SEE Opening Brief included in Evidence CD (“EXHIBITS\Exhibit C - Case Files\Exhibit C-8 - Federal Court Habeas.doc\ Opening Brief Clive Boustred 6th Appellat Court v6 FILED.doc”). Case after case shows that criminals are being appointed to senior positions in government, including our current President and Attoerny General. And the judiciary is entirely responsible for literally appointing George W. Bush as President over the popular vote – and that is even over a completely rigged voting system designed as the Chairman of the largest vote counting systems, Diebold Election Systems, Walden O'Dell, stated "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president [G.W. Bush] next year." At Global Election Systems now called Diebold Election Systems, the Senior Vice-President and Senior Programmer, Jeff Dean, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft for planting back doors in software he created for ATMs. Countless audits prove the voting machines have been rigged. Programmers have come forward and formally told Congress the machines are rigged and patriots repeatedly demonstrate how easily the machines are rigged. The judiciary is in on the crime. The growth of the Prison Industry is visually represented in the chart opposite: While based on the prison industry statistics alone, most judges, DA’s, police and lawyers in the U.S. should be charged and tried for treason, perhaps one of the most disturbing factors, is the massive buildup of Concentration Camps throughout the U.S.[8]. While the public is well aware of the many international Concentration Camps the U.S. has built, such as Guantánamo Bay, the buildup of Concentration Camps within the U.S. and the laws to support them goes almost unnoticed. Halliburton Contracts confirm the construction of the Concentration Camps within the U.S. For example, Halliburton subsidiary "KBR has been awarded a contract announced by the Department of Homeland Security’s United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) component. The Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contingency contract is to support ICE facilities and has a maximum total value of $385 million over a five year term. The contract provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the United States, or to support the rapid development of new programs".[9] Army Regulation 210—35 “Installations, Civilian Inmate Labor Program” and H.R.6166, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, show us that the U.S. government is absolutely serious about Concentration Camps in the U.S. Letters from Congressmen confirm the same.[10] The John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007, H.R.5122, which grants the President the right to commandeer Federal and State National Guard Troops for use against citizen, indicates who it is the government intends to throw into these Concentration Camps. Since 1878, through two World Wars, Depressions, the Posse Comitatus Act protected U.S. citizens from their own military. Somehow, however, this government believes that the U.S. military must now be deployed against U.S. Citizens. Why? One has to carefully consider what we are all up against, particularly, when one learns that the 9/11 attacks were instigated by people in our own government and the attack was used as the basis for justifying these extreme and outrageous eliminations of liberty. FALSE FLAG OPERATIONS Blowing up Buildings &
Murdering Citizens To Incite War & Eliminate Liberty
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
to
cover up the facts exposing the complete complicity of senior
politicians direct involvement in planning and carrying out the 9/11
attacks is so blatantly obvious, only a moron would not see through the
deception. On 9/11 Cheney was running the largest war-games exercises
ever in the U.S:
otal
disbelief of the official government 9/11 Commission Report.
nformation
regarding the Weapons of Mass Destruction that never existed in Iraq,
the government’s justification for invading Iraq is utterly without any
merit what so ever. |
CALCULATING REAL TAX RATES |
Annual |
Monthly |
|
Gross Employee Pay |
$ 48,443 |
$ 4,037 |
|
Salary |
$ 45,000 |
$ 3,750 |
|
Federal Withholding Tax |
$ 8,184 |
$ 682 |
|
Medicare Employee Tax |
$ 653 |
$ 54 |
|
Social Security Employee Tax |
$ 2,790 |
$ 233 |
|
CA Withholding Tax |
$ 2,335 |
$ 195 |
|
CA Disability Employee Tax |
$ 360 |
$ 30 |
|
TOTAL Withheld From Employee |
$ 14,322 |
$ 1,193 |
|
Net Take Home Pay |
$ 30,678 |
$ 2,557 |
|
Federal Unemployment - Employer Tax |
$ - |
$ - |
|
Medicare Employer Tax |
$ 653 |
$ 54 |
|
Social Security Employer Tax |
$ 2,790 |
$ 233 |
|
CA Unemployment Employer Tax |
$ - |
$ - |
|
TOTAL Employer Tax |
$ 3,443 |
$ 287 |
|
TOTAL Wages TAX |
$ 17,764 |
$ 1,480 |
|
Tax Rate On Wages |
37% |
37% |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Taxes |
|
|
|
8% Sales Tax on 60% of Net Take-home Pay |
$ 1,473 |
$ 123 |
|
1% Property Tax Ave Home Value of $500K |
$ 5,000 |
$ 417 |
|
Telephone Tax |
$ 230 |
$ 19 |
|
Road Tax |
$ 375 |
$ 31 |
|
Gas Tax |
$ 347 |
$ 29 |
|
Other Tax Total |
$ 7,425 |
$ 619 |
|
Tax Rate on Other Taxes |
15% |
15% |
|
TOTAL TAX |
$ 25,189 |
$ 2,099 |
|
Actual Total Tax Rate |
52% |
52% |
Most citizens work six months of the year to pay taxes. The tax these citizens pay goes into paying off the interest bankers charge they U.S. for money the government borrowed, money the bankers manufactured out of thin air. On top of this extraordinary 6 month slavery tax, the largest chunk of most citizens remaining income goes into paying interest on mortgages and credit cards. The final income citizens and their families have to survive on is around twenty to thirty percent of their annual salary. It makes no difference if the person is an employee of the government or not.
The net effect of the depreciation of the dollar coupled with inflation of real estate, creates and environment where citizens are forced to go to the bank and borrow money to buy their homes, with the net effect of the banks literally owning peoples homes. With money made out of fresh air, the agents of the Rothschild’s have invaded and taken control of most peoples homes, companies and land throughout the U.S., without firing a single bullet. Well ok, they had to shoot a couple of presidents and people who stood in their way.
The following graph reflects the Interest rates the owners of the private Federal Reserve Bank charged after manufacturing dollars out of thin air and lending them back to the public (typically, their co-conspirator banks add an additional ten to twenty five percent interest on top of these central banks rates):
The largest shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Rothschild’s, put Lenin on a train to Moscow with five million dollars in gold and around 36 of their agents. These terrorists instigated the Bolshevik revolution. Terrorist who initiated the Bolshevik revolution were also dispatched by the banksters from New York[17].
The State through the Courts now assume the role of Head of Family and take control of our children's interests – you don’t get more communistic than this. The State now also even actively involves itself in religion through "faith based initiatives" while the far worse and foolish imposition of "State controlled education" has been enforced for many decades. Separation of Church and State is indeed important, however, Separation of School and State is vastly more important. Most people educated by the State even thing Lincoln was honest and that the civil war was about slavery[18].
The Federal State maintains absolute control of media through the FCC who also illegally traffics in the people's frequency selling spectrum for billions of dollars. Naturally the owners of the bank who write checks for billions of dollars they create out of fresh air, are the only ones who can afford to purchase the spectrum.
According to the Treasury Department, the government claims the right to seize all financial instruments, currency, gold, silver and every thing else if they deem an emergency exists. Surely the U.S. is far worse off under the Rothschild’s New World Order than they were under King George.
Illegal Tender Conspiracy: Stealing Real Assets With Illegal Tender Created Out of Noting
The privately owned Federal Reserve Bank, who is not a part of the U.S. government (The Federal Reserve Bank is a much part of the government as Federal Express is), represents the worlds most outrageous and criminal conspiracy that has and is responsible for the most violent wars and depressions throughout the last century and is responsible for the financial ruin or financial enslavement of most citizens of the United States of America.
The Federal Reserve Bank literally has fraudulently and illegally obtained the so-called right to create U.S. Dollars out of nothing.
The owners of the Federal Reserve Bank, foremost of whom are the Rothschild’s, invent money by simply entering it into their account. For paper money the Bank pays the U.S. Mint printing costs to provide them with Notes they claim to be Legal Tender. The owners of the Federal Reserve Bank literally have the so-called exclusive right to add as many U.S. Dollars into their bank as they want. This criminal conspiracy then turns around and lends these U.S. Dollars they created out of nothing to citizens of the United States and people and corporations around the world. The bank exchanges the money they made out of nothing for ownership in real assets. An invasion by fraud that literally passes ownership of real assets to the Rothschild’s and their co-owners of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Federal Reserve Bank owners and co-conspirators have been directly associated with initiating and fueling the following:
· Instigating Lincoln’s War and the assassination of Lincoln and conversion of greenbacks into bankers debt.
· World War I, which was made possible by the funds available from the Federal Reserve Bank that was fraudulently formed the year before in 1913.
· The French Revolution
· The Bolshevik Revolution & Socialism/Communism (Funding Hitler, Lenin, Stalin and the U.S.)
· The Agricultural Depression of 1920.
· Black Friday Crash on Wall Street of October, 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression (Installing FDR who stole the people’s gold, instituted the FCC to control media, the SEC to control competing stock or notes, the IRS and Social Security for Socialism).
· The assassination of President Kennedy (Who started to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank)
· World War II (Tens of millions murdered)
· The Korean War
· The Vietnam War (3 million murdered)
· The conversion of the assets of the United States and its citizens from real property to paper assets from 1945 to the present
· The assassination attempt on President Ronald Regan (When he started to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank)
· The market crash in the 1980’s
· The technology market crash in 1989
· The FBI bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993
· The Dot Com / Internet market crash
· The 9/11 False Flag bombing of the World Trade Center and Pentagon
· The Gulf War (1 million murdered – 73,000 U.S Veterans dead, 1.2 million disabled)
· The current real estate market crash
· The deaths of more people than any other institution or organization ever.
By employing their Hegelian Dialectic Process to cause conflict the banksters have been able to position themselves to steal during the changes caused by the conflict they trigger. Key to the Rothschild/Weishaupt world dominance plan has been the complete dominance of media. The reason you will not find these facts on regular TV or News Papers was explained by their agent Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf: "In journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a ‘Great Power’ within the State. As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press continues the work of education even in adult life. … With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the Nation."
Other notable quotations relating to this extraordinary world dominance conspiracy are:
“The masses indulge in petty falsehoods every day, but it would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths… The bigger the lie therefore, the likelier it is to be believed.” – Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” – President J. Edgar Hoover
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the State." Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels, Propaganda Minister of Nazi Germany.
"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II
The Rothschild/Weishapt/Illuminati world dominance conspiracy was first publically discovered in 1784 when a courier carrying papers for the Illuminati was struck by lightning in Bavaria[19].
The Federal Reserve Bank, it’s owners and co-conspirators subject citizens to abject slavery and servitude. The average citizen works more than six months of their year to pay the many forms of tax, for their remaining year, three to four months or more are worked to pay interest to bankers. Citizens take home perhaps one to three months of their annual income. This is the case for the great majority of people around the world whether they work for the government or not. Foolishly we have allowed ourselves to be deceived, with a slight of hand the ‘Hegelian magicians’ have managed to confuse us with, in a ‘dialectic processes’ that get us fighting amongst and oppressing each other, while the bankers, or banksters referred to herein, literally steal the bank and everything we work for and own behind our backs.
This grand conspiracy was initiated by Mayer Amschel Bauer of Frankfurt, Germany, who changed his name to Mayer Amschel Rothschild and who formalized said conspiracy when Adam Weishaupt who was retained by Rothschild to revitalize Zionism completed said conspiracy plan on May 1, 1776.
· May 1, 1776 Whitehouse retained by Rothschild's completes world dominance plan.
· 1776-1790: U.S. Independence - Free Banking -no formal central bank.
· 1791-1811: First Bank of the United States.
· 1816-1836: Second Bank of the United States.
· 1837-1862: Free Banking Era -no formal central bank.
· 1862-1913: System of National Banks (Consequence of Lincoln's War).
· 1914-crrent: A consortium of 12 privately held banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest share holder of the bank are the Rothschild's of London
In November, 1910, agents of the conspirators met on Jekyll Island, Georgia to formalize the enactment of said conspiracy in the final form of the Federal Reserve Bank Act which was fraudulently passed during Christmas recess in 1913.
Said conspiracy literally handed exclusive money making rights to the privately held Federal Reserve Bank, granting the owners of that bank the so-called right to create out of thin air as many dollars as they want. This ability to make money out of thin air, gave the conspirators the ability to purchase anything they wanted, including all the major media channels, the military industrial complex, many major corporations in addition to paying off many of our government officials.
The Tender DEFENDNTS listed in this case loaned to PLAINTIFFS is in fact ‘fiat currency’, that is the Federal Reserve Bank is not obligated to give in exchange to the holder of a note gold, silver, or any specific tangible property. In other words the Note and Tender DEFENDANTS loaned PLAINTIFFS, is based on and backed by nothing. The Tender loaned by DEFENDANTS was invented and created out of thin air to defraud PLAINTIFFS of real property. Said fraud having created artificially inflated prices on real property which in turn forced PLAINTIFFS to borrow said illegal Tender in order to be able to afford what normally would have cost a fraction of the price PLAINTIFFS were forced to pay as a consequence of the conspirator’s fraud. Said conspirators have thus defrauded PLAINTIFFS through deceptively implying that their Notes were legal Tender, claiming on their Notes “THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE” and baring the signature and seal of the Treasurer of the United States and Secretary of the Treasury of the United States Government, “The United States of America” and images mostly of past Presidents of the United States of America with most ironically “We the People” on certain Notes.
In fact DEFENDANTS have loaned PLAININTIFF nothing other than Tender invented from stale air, Tender that is factually worthless other than through continued deception. DEFENDANTS having forced PLAINTIFFS to purchase fraudulent Federal Reserve Notes in order to pay DEFENDANTS, thus forcing PLAINTIFFS to exchange real services and real goods to purchase said fraudulent and factually worthless Notes of illegal Tender.
Let the JURY NOTE: The images of Past Presidents on said Federal Reserve Bank Notes are Presidents who adamantly and vehemently opposed any private ownership of National Banks such as what the Federal Reserve Bank Act fraudulently installed. Significant evidence supports claims that said bankers agents attempted to or did assassinate the people they show on their Notes.
NOTE NOT IN ORIGINAL SUIT: The realization that the Old World Order simply called themselves the New World Order in order to trick good people into believing that they represented Nuvus Ordo Seclorum followed this lawsuit. Incidentally, Santa Cruz County had to issue an illegal eviction order of Clive and arrest him and hold him hostage while they called hearings to have this lawsuit dismissed.
The One Dollar Note also bares an image of the
Masonic Pyramid and “all seeing eye” with the Latin “Nuvus Ordo Seclorum”
which translates to “A New Order of the Ages”, or
New
World Order, reflecting said conspiracy. On the side baring the image
of George Washington, above top left scallop in the frame surrounding
the number 1 in the upper right hand corner of the One Dollar Note, the
owl representing the god or Moloch can be found, illustrated below:
The significance of the owl on the Federal Reserve Bank Note can best be demonstrated by the ceremony the politically elite perform at the annual Bohemian Club Bohemian Grove “Cremation of Care” ceremony representing a human sacrifice in front of the owl god of Moloch, show below[20]:
Criminal Civil Courts
Practice in the civil courts has reached the astonishingly absurd level where real parties of interest often are not only not present in, many cases they are never present. Instead lawyers and judges meet repeatedly arguing technicalities that bare little if any relation to the real matter brought before the court, not only unnecessarily building up fees and wages, in what can be considered one of the most corrupt industries in the nation, but utterly destroying any form of justice, peoples lives, corporations and the Nation itself.
Consider Who & What You Work For
With these blatant facts and clear argument, attorneys representing the very body responsible for ensuring law and order, the Attorney General’s Office, thinking only of their personal profit and position, will rush down and work with their fellow agents of the Rothschild’s to unlawfully dismiss this case so that every fact and every crime committed against the plaintiffs, by both agents of the State and private parties, can be completely ignored, and the murderers, kidnappers and thieves they defend will go free. Surely we are far worse off than being under the former rule of King George of England that inspired this people to revolution.
If the officers of this court can for one moment put aside the delusion that denying these plaintiffs the law, will some how benefit themselves or their comrades, and realize that these plaintiffs actually have a solution to the problems our Nation and world faces, could we would all benefit significantly.
[1] See “FBI & CIA Admit culpability in the February 26, 1993 World Trade Center Bombing” - http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/twin-perils.htm and other sources re the WTC 1993 bombing.
[2] The Department of Veterans Affairs May 2007, Gulf War Veterans Information System reports the following: Total U.S. Military Gulf War Deaths: 73,846, Total number of disability claims filed: 1,620,906 – see http://www1.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/GWVIS_May2007.pdf see also http://www.libertyforlife.com/military-war/73_thousand_us_gulf_war_casualties.htm
[3] The Department of Veterans Affairs May 2007, Gulf War Veterans Information System reports the following: Total U.S. Military Gulf War Deaths: 73,846, Total number of disability claims filed: 1,620,906 – see http://www1.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/GWVIS_May2007.pdf see also http://www.libertyforlife.com/military-war/73_thousand_us_gulf_war_casualties.htm
[5] Source: Department of Justice http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/correct.htm
[6] Source: World Prison Population List (sixth edition), International Centre for Prison Studies: http://www.kcl.ac.uk
[7] See documents included in the ECHIBITS folders “EXHIBITS\Exhibit C - Case Files\Exhibit C-8 - Federal Court Habeas.doc\ Opening Brief Clive Boustred 6th Appellat Court v6 FILED.doc” and EXHIBITS\Exhibit C - Case Files\Exhibit C-3\Placer Opening Brief Exhibits 5-3-04.doc
[9] http://www.halliburton.com/default/main/halliburton/eng/news/source_files/press_release/2006/corpnws_012606.pdf
[10] See http://www.libertyforlife.com/jail-police/us_concentration_camps.htm
[11] See http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/911/911_rumsfeld_declars_war_on_pentagon.html and http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/911/pentagon_cruse_missile_911_vict.html
see also http://www.libertyforlife.com9/eye-openers/11-inside-job.htm and http://www.libertyforlife.com9/eye-openers/experts_officials_coming_out.htm and http://911scholars.org
[14] Dept Vet. Affairs http://www1.va.gov/rac-gwvi/docs/GWVIS_May2007.pdf
[16] Bush Above The Law - Gives the Senate Judiciary Committee the Up Yours!
http://www.libertyforlife.com/constitution/politicians/bush_above_the_law.htm
Bush Declares Geneva Convention Invalid: http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/bush_ignores_geneva_convention.htm
Bush Bin Laden Bonanza: Bush Family Attorneys Run Terrorists Escrow Account http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/bush_bin_laden_bonanza.htm
http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/
Hitler & the Bush’s http://www.libertyforlife.com/constitution/politicians/bushes.htm
Bush Bolt Hole Next To Nazi War Criminals http://www.libertyforlife.com/constitution/politicians/bush-bolthole.htm
President Unelect, Bush Makes New Law Declaring His Actions, Crimes & Records Secret http://www.libertyforlife.com/eye-openers/us-eye-openers.html#bushsecrets
[17] The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations by Myron C. Fagan, 1967. http://www.libertyforlife.com/nwo/illuminati_and_council_on_foreigh_relations.htm
[19] The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations by Myron C. Fagan, 1967. http://www.libertyforlife.com/nwo/illuminati_and_council_on_foreigh_relations.htm
I. CLAIMS UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED / CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED