7th Malicious Prosecution
CHP Assaults & Places Under False Arrest LFL & CC Chairman
In the 7th Malicious Prosecution against LFL Founder since
the governments assassination attempt on Clive's life failed in
2003, Clive is charged with being drunk in public when he was
neither drunk nor in public. The whole 7th case and 5th
false arrest was captured on video showing that the cops have no
idea as to the most elementary elements of the law. The
video also shows the cops assaulting Clive, however, it's Clive
the government is prosecuting, the same as when the Sheriffs
shot at Clive and his children.
By now Clive knows what to expect, however he never expected to be
rushed into a trial without any ability to hire or be provided counsel,
however, well aware of the criminal nature of cops, DA's and Judges,
Clive documented this trial well. Expect the audio of the trial
shortly. This is yet another classic example of how out of control
the police, DA and judiciary really are. CHP stops the pickup
Clive is traveling as a passenger in and demands to see the licenses of
the passengers in the back of the pickup. Clive hands the cop his
business card which more than sufficiently identifies him, even though
Clive could have simply refused to identify himself - see the Lawson
case which is a tremendous example of what one person can do without
http://edwardlawson.com/ Edward Lawson is a National Hero and
should be saluted by all of us. The cops then sought to belittle
Clive and demanded that Clive announce his age in front of all his
friends. Clive refused, telling the cops to run his name.
Then Clive asked the cops why they had stopped the vehicle, what the
MENS REA, ACTUS REUS and CORPUS DELICTI of the crime they were
investigating was. To his astonishment, and somewhat amusement,
the cops never even knew what these three elements they would have
learned in 101 Law were. For
every crime there must exist all three elements of a crime: MENS REA -
willful intent, ACTUS REUS - act or crime, CORPUS DELICTI - the damage
or body of the crime. It's not a crime if there is no Act, Intent
and Damage! The rooky cops were clueless so they decided to pick
What is so amazing in the US is how trained and subservient the
general public is. What does the 9th Amendment dictate? Your
right shall not diminish. So, if you could ride in the back of a
pickup truck in 2007, why could you not continue riding in the back of a
pickup. Does the government have a right to intervene in our
lives. When will the government order how you poop?
Seriously, some societies insist, not unreasonably that sitting on a
toilet seat is filthy, their toilets are simply holes in the ground.
So when will the government order you to poop in a hole in the ground?
After Clive exercised his reasonable and lawful right to refuse to
publically announce his age, the cops ask Clive to get out of the truck.
Clive asks, "Is that a request or an arrest?", when the cop says it is a
request, Clive exercises his right and refuses the request. The
cops then eventually order Clive to exit the truck, which Clive could
have refused, however, by now the cops training in creating conflict had
driven Clive's complaint friends into a frenzy, so Clive complied and
got off the truck. Announcing in a tired voice recognizing that he
is going to be falsely arrested again, he answers the drive of the truck
(whom Clive never knew) as to why he was standing up for his rights
"Because I was born in Africa and I emigrated to America to.." before
Clive could finish the cop violently assaults Clive. The cops grab
Clive's camera and quickly switch it off while they assault Clive.
In the last part of the video, you can hear Clive's friend asking the
cop to give her back Clive's camera.
The video clearly shows that Clive is well able to care for himself
and is certainly not intoxicated as charged, that he identified himself
with his business card to the CHP officer more than meeting the
requirements of identification of a person who is not driving and who
does not have their drivers license on them. However, what is shown here
is that the CHP officer literally assaults Clive. The officers along
with Santa Cruz DA Bob Lee filed charges against Clive and gave him a
sham trial where Clive was found guilty of resisting arrest, the jury
did not find Clive guilt of public intoxication, Clive was not in public
and he was not intoxicated. Does this mean that cops can order you out
of a vehicle and assault you and accuse you of whatever?
On April 1, 2009 the Courts abandoned the law
again and Liberty For Life Founder was rushed into trial without any right to counsel.
See the menu on the left for more on this case.
Request For Help Clive Sent to TV, News & Radio
I am being brought
to trial without any right to counsel. Do you have any idea what I
can do? The Courts are flat out refusing to follow the law. Having
committed no crime, I am facing life in prison.
As a consequence of
9 maliciously prosecuted cases and ongoing assault from Santa Cruz
County officials since they shot at me in front of my children in
2003, I can no longer afford counsel. I asked for a public defender
but the Court has refused to give me one.
case goes to trial this Monday. I asked for an extension so that I
can use money coming into a company I am working for to be used for
hiring an attorney (I work for a green power company that powers
generators with water- we have no pollution, the only byproduct is
H2O). The court refused any extension.
In the case to be
tried on Monday, I was traveling lying down in the back of a pickup
truck with four friends. The cops stopped the pickup and demanded
our licenses, I did not have my license on me but handed them my
business card. They arrested me and accused me of being drunk in
public and interfering with an investigation. I was neither drunk
nor in public while the amusing part of the 'investigation' is that
when I asked the cops what the Mens Rea, Actus Reus or Corpus
Delicti of the crime they were investigating was, they did not even
know what the three necessary legal elements of a crime are. The
whole thing was caught on tape. See
They refused to
give me a breath analyzer or blood test. In 2006 they arrested me
when I was driving and gave me the clown tests, eight blow job tests
and three blood tests, I passed every test and they still arrested
me and stole my vehicle. I sued them however they refused to allow
me to bring that case to trial. Despite the CHP officer failing to
make any appearance, the U.S. District Court refused to give me the
Summary Judgment I was entitled to.
Clearly this case
as in all 9 cases the government has filed against me are
retaliatory in an attempt to silence me and the crimes they are
actively committing against my children and I and against general
liberty or anyone who dares to claim their rights under the law. I
suspect the companies I was building that could completely fix the
financial mess the U.S. is in and take the country into an economic
boom are the reasons I am being targeted.
would be greatly appreciated. I can be reached at
email@example.com naturally I am scrambling to prepare
for a trial I am not ready for and don't have any counsel to assist
me. The trial is scheduled to start in Department 1 of the Santa
Cruz Superior Court 701 Ocean Street at 9:30 am on Monday April 6,
clearly being no case for the government, I am particularly
concerned as when they shot at me and my children they sent me to
jail for six months. The Santa Cruz Court said that driving along
an empty private road at 27mph is a felony. All my appeals were
On the 23rd
of April they are bringing five more false felony charges and one
misdemeanor charge against me in the 8th and 9th
Because I sent the
Sheriffs fifteen legal proofs that Josephs eviction order was
illegal, they said that I threatened an unknown public official, a
felony. And they say that because I own guns which I purchased with
permits I am guilty of four more felonies.
The government has
taken everything from me, my home, my children, my companies and my
liberty. I could not even wish my son’s Merry Christmas or Happy
Birthday, I am not aloud to communicate with my boys in any way.
This is so wrong. Clearly neither I nor my children have any legal
rights in the courts. I have committed no crime yet the government
keeps on filing false case after false case against me. I am an
honest hard working citizen risking my life for the United States of
America; all I can do is to appeal to my fellow citizens for help.